Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: OMFG - Lady Di was not Anglo-Saxon -is this the end of the monarchy??? [View all]RobinA
(10,476 posts)16. But...
the real question is, was Diana a Chinese spy? India is just south of China, separated only by a large mountain range. Seems to me the Indian relatives could have had some cross-mountain communication, even contact, with the Chinese, which means that Diana could have been related to someone who was related to someone who knew someone who was Chinese. And didn't she wear silk dresses sometimes? Silk can come from China, ya know.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
107 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
OMFG - Lady Di was not Anglo-Saxon -is this the end of the monarchy??? [View all]
malaise
Jun 2013
OP
Actually the German origins of the Brit Royals goes back to George I (Georg Ludwig of Hanover)
leveymg
Jun 2013
#31
No, that's one line of European monarchy they're not connected with - they're Catholic
muriel_volestrangler
Jun 2013
#91
And the ones for several hundred years before that were Normans-i.e. Frenchified Vikings.
hobbit709
Jun 2013
#89
well if its a joke should it not be funny, as i said who cares what his dna is
loli phabay
Jun 2013
#15
And Japan, can't forget about the Land of the Rising Sun. Always facing at the USA. Eek!!!
freshwest
Jun 2013
#21
if your not a british subject then you dont really get a say. so why care if the brits have a
loli phabay
Jun 2013
#58
probuably because american policies effect othwr countries, whereas the monarchy does not
loli phabay
Jun 2013
#65
the queen has some power but parliament is the power, house of lords is part of the check
loli phabay
Jun 2013
#69
Nah, they are good for tourism and provide us with countless hours of entertainment.
idwiyo
Jun 2013
#48
For that matter, Philip was reckoned good looking when he still had his hair
muriel_volestrangler
Jun 2013
#62
So many peoples have lived in England, sometimes conquered it, that not an eyebrow will be raised
Hekate
Jun 2013
#50
What's also hilarious is that some Americans these days seem to think "white" = "Anglo Saxon"...
Hekate
Jun 2013
#92
Lady Almina's Earl was an early and enthusiastic scholar/archaeologist of ancient Egypt
Hekate
Jun 2013
#98
Wouldn't be so bad if they didn't grin at you because it was so much fun.
Spitfire of ATJ
Jun 2013
#99
Queen Victoria and her 9 children really mixed up European royalty:
Are_grits_groceries
Jun 2013
#55
Let's not. I find the Middletons to be loathsome social climbers, and I do not exclude Catherine.
WinkyDink
Jun 2013
#74
Well, I kind of do about mere et pere. And Kate is a wee too WAG in her fashion sense for me. But I
WinkyDink
Jun 2013
#106