Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: PRISM Isn’t Data Mining and Other Falsehoods in the N.S.A. “Scandal” [View all]thucythucy
(9,063 posts)34. Then too, there was the second part of post 9:
"And because stealing and releasing classified documents -- and claiming to have thousands more of them -- is not an insignificant crime."
Do you disagree?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
83 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
PRISM Isn’t Data Mining and Other Falsehoods in the N.S.A. “Scandal” [View all]
JaneyVee
Jun 2013
OP
looking on the bright side, it does explain why so many keep repeating things
Bodhi BloodWave
Jun 2013
#11
This is Ratfuck #4 for the summer and the best one yet. Probably bubble a month as they create #5.
freshwest
Jun 2013
#64
i think the 'scandal'.. which, i guess it needs to be said, doesn't tarnish..
Phillip McCleod
Jun 2013
#13
For some rationalization is the key to happiness. But what you are stating is a bunch
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#35
Doesn't the Constitution police the rules? None of the evidence could be used against you
JaneyVee
Jun 2013
#37
The Constitution is a piece of paper and doesnt "police" anyone. All challenges of violations of
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#39
LOL and who told you the govt employs millions of people to listen to every phone
DevonRex
Jun 2013
#60
"If you reply, I'll just repeat my question which has not been answered, so don't bother."
OilemFirchen
Jun 2013
#77
What gets to me is the furor to explain (or demand) that there is nothing wrong here.
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#70
I agree. And I hate to tell the deniers that the genie wont go back into the bottle. nm
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#73
BINGO. It interprets the law however it needs to to obtain all the info it wants.
MotherPetrie
Jun 2013
#57
Sounds like what Sanchez may have been saying about being the tip of the iceberg
Life Long Dem
Jun 2013
#55
I'll believe what former Cato Institute and Koch Brothers employee Libertarian Glenn Greenwald
Ikonoklast
Jun 2013
#69
