Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 08:20 AM Jun 2013

So what is the end game in Syria? What is that the admin hopes to accomplish? [View all]

As they haven't said (at least I can't find that they've having articulated an end game), I'm curious what people here think; both those supporting intervention it and those against it.

End game? Anyone?'

This is an interesting piece on what could happen. It was written a month ago. None of the scenarios are exactly rosy.

http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/12967/strategic-horizons-endgame-scenarios-for-the-syrian-conflict

31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
end game- 80-20, Hillary/Booker landslide 500 electoral votes, 129 million popular votes. 6-3 SCOTUS graham4anything Jun 2013 #1
well, that's disgusting as well as totally inane and ridiculous. cali Jun 2013 #2
No, you asked what I would like the end game of all the anti-Obama smears to be, and I answered. graham4anything Jun 2013 #4
I sure the fuck did not ask that. not a little bit. not even close. not even in the same universe. cali Jun 2013 #6
I am still waiting for the 8,323,123 times they said Iran would bombed, and SS would be cut. graham4anything Jun 2013 #8
let's see: food stamps are being cut- significantly. I never said Iran would be bombed. cali Jun 2013 #10
Cut him a little slack. kentuck Jun 2013 #20
Huh? maddezmom Jun 2013 #11
Destabilization -> Invasion -> More US military bases -> Imposition of friendly "democracy"? Junkdrawer Jun 2013 #3
Weaken Iran, and thereby weaken China. Laelth Jun 2013 #5
I keep saying the most dangerous moments in world history... Junkdrawer Jun 2013 #7
Very good point Eddie Haskell Jun 2013 #25
They don't ALWAYS lead to war. US & Britain in the 20s comes to mind... Junkdrawer Jun 2013 #31
I'm sure you will be determining that treestar Jun 2013 #9
one would think that as the admin has been discusssing intervention in syria and has decided cali Jun 2013 #12
it would end if Assad stopped killing his people. DCBob Jun 2013 #13
how about the rebels? oh those noble innocents. cali Jun 2013 #15
Nobody is innocent in that mess. DCBob Jun 2013 #17
The American Myopia Game... KharmaTrain Jun 2013 #14
End the bloodshed? That's a HUGE fucking gamble. cali Jun 2013 #16
We will be arming members of AQ Aerows Jun 2013 #19
ending the bloodshed... IDemo Jun 2013 #23
Arming members of AQ Aerows Jun 2013 #18
My opinion: kentuck Jun 2013 #21
Justify the existence of the MIC. mattclearing Jun 2013 #22
A New American Century Eddie Haskell Jun 2013 #24
Because letting Russia and Iran help Assad restore order is too awful to imagine... Junkdrawer Jun 2013 #26
PNAC. ozone_man Jun 2013 #27
The objective remains the same Eddie Haskell Jun 2013 #30
create more terrorists to fight for profit Monkie Jun 2013 #28
To maintain hegemony, to weaken Israel's rivals. Read "A Clean Break" (PNAC, 1997) leveymg Jun 2013 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So what is the end game i...