Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Al Gore: NSA Surveillance Violates The Constitution Updated [View all]Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)31. This happened in 1996.
Gore gave the money back.
He had to.
Everyone took it for granted that Gore would again be on the Democratic ticket in 1996. The Clinton-Gore team won 49 percent of the vote to 41 percent for Republican Bob Dole and 8 percent for Ross Perot.
As the automatic front-runner for the Democratic nomination in 2000, Gore had developed a reputation as a remarkable fund raiser, until embarrassing questions surfaced. It was revealed that Gore's appearance at the Hsi Lai Buddhist Temple in Los Angeles had generated campaign donations, despite a federal law that prohibited fund raising at tax-exempt institutions.
Gore insisted that he had been unaware of the fund raising, which caused columnist Mary McGrory to wonder how the "best-briefed man in Washington" could have gone so uninformed.
Damaging charges appeared the following March in a front-page exposé by the Washington Post's investigative reporter Bob Woodward, who revealed that White House staff had dubbed Gore the "solicitor-in-chief." Woodward documented fifty-two calls that Gore had made on White House phones to raise nearly $800,000 in contributions. Gores attorneys assured him that no court had ever ruled such actions illegal. At a press conference, the vice president
said that "no controlling legal authority" had barred him from doing it, but his repetition of that phrase seven times made it appear that he was hiding behind the legal jargon. No formal charges were brought but the incident shook his straight-arrow public image.
Link --
http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/Gore,_Albert.pdf
Bottom of Page 10.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
120 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Al Gore is not a real Democrat. He said he invented the internet & that is a proven lie.
Luminous Animal
Jun 2013
#1
Well, they trashed Alan Grayson and praised Peter 'we-count-the-votes) King, so you're probably
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#5
It's a bunch of think tank whiz kids looking to usurp the site IMHO. Paid shills.
grahamhgreen
Jun 2013
#92
Yet, people trashed Bill Clinton yesterday. I guess it's selective, isn't it.
graham4anything
Jun 2013
#28
Bill Clinton was President for 8 years and took the same smears as President Obama.
graham4anything
Jun 2013
#44
1968 all the protesters accomplished was to elect Nixon once LBJ was tossed into the sea.
graham4anything
Jun 2013
#81
Hong Kong Al! It's very interesting that he said he invented the internet! Has anyone
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#4
But but but we've been assured by latrine-educated Constitutional Experts here that that
Catherina
Jun 2013
#2
The same guy who took money from Buddhists at their temple, and then claimed that there was no
Major Hogwash
Jun 2013
#24
Well, it was much more than just those incidents that caused Gore to crash and burn.
Major Hogwash
Jun 2013
#35
Thank you Pres. Gore. But you'll remember the people falling all over themselves to....
Tarheel_Dem
Jun 2013
#10
All I remember about Al Gore is that he wore warm tones. What do you remember?
Luminous Animal
Jun 2013
#12
Kick for the OP, and Catherina and Sabrina - women who never shirk from keeping their
Luminous Animal
Jun 2013
#11
Thank you Luminous :) And kick for you and all the other fighters here who do the same
Catherina
Jun 2013
#50
I think Al needs to have a close door session with those who actually know the specifics.
DCBob
Jun 2013
#37
Surely you see the legitimate conflicting issues of personal rights and national security.
DCBob
Jun 2013
#48
It's got nothing to do with keeping American's safer - Perhaps you should try reading a bit
TakeALeftTurn
Jun 2013
#58
Im sure I could find dozens of other national security experts would disagree with that.
DCBob
Jun 2013
#88
The very same politicians that claim we need to give up our privacy for national security
cpwm17
Jun 2013
#65
You draw the line to always favor personal rights. It's really simple, really.
TransitJohn
Jun 2013
#109
How tragic it is to actually read a thread on DU and consider how much substance it contains.
Coyotl
Jun 2013
#103
How tragic it is to actually read a thread on DU and consider how much substance it contains.
Coyotl
Jun 2013
#105
babble bullshit. do learn how to write simple sentence that makes just a wee bit of sense.
cali
Jun 2013
#106
What's tragic is what New Dems, Blue Dogs, DLC-Third Wayers are doing to the party.
Fuddnik
Jun 2013
#116
If Gore really believes this then why isnt he challenging it before SCOTUS to put the whole thing to
cstanleytech
Jun 2013
#119