Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DirkGently

(12,151 posts)
6. Echh. Sorry, but that's patented Conspiracy Theory talk.
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 10:52 AM
Jun 2013

Last edited Sat Jun 15, 2013, 11:48 AM - Edit history (1)

Throwing up a lot of vague, "what about this and that?" queries without any kind of rational narrative is the hallmark of the worst species of conspiracy talk. It implies and suggests and whispers that the "official story" cannot be so, while offering no plausible narrative of its own, and asking for an unsupported conclusion.

"I don't know what this hair is, so ... Bigfoot!" "I don't understand how an airliner could knock down a building so ... something something demolition!"

Guy strikes me as being a little full of himself. But he's not the issue. No one has suggested the docs produced are not real, or that the program we were told was "fixed" has not continued or expanded exactly as has been suggested.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Naomi Wolf Thinks Edward ...»Reply #6