Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

bunnies

(15,859 posts)
74. wow. What a complete idiot.
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 11:06 AM
Jun 2013

I cant believe how many people STILL believe facebook exists in a vacuum.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

stupid, stupid, stupid. rucky Jun 2013 #1
+1000 !!!! orpupilofnature57 Jun 2013 #2
Yep. And he could be in big trouble according to some legal experts davidn3600 Jun 2013 #5
No, potential jurors being questioned are not under oath. former9thward Jun 2013 #46
I don't think that is true Duer 157099 Jun 2013 #54
Dang grok Jun 2013 #3
Perjury is not on the table. former9thward Jun 2013 #48
maybe it's called something else then grok Jun 2013 #58
Never prosecuted. former9thward Jun 2013 #59
Yes they are lawwolf Jun 2013 #60
Again, different courts do it differently. former9thward Jun 2013 #62
I bet a few bigoted gun nuts end up on jury. Hoyt Jun 2013 #4
As opposed to those that think he's guilty premium Jun 2013 #10
Nope. Just talking about those like Zimmerman -- bigoted bullies who loves their guns Hoyt Jun 2013 #14
So you're not ok with gun owners on the jury, premium Jun 2013 #15
I hope the jury is fair. I think fairness will tick off most gun cultists. Hoyt Jun 2013 #22
Ahh Hoyt, premium Jun 2013 #23
Six jurors in Florida criminal cases. Nimajneb Nilknarf Jun 2013 #24
There's only 6 jurors on a jury in FL? nt. premium Jun 2013 #25
That's right. The Zimmerman trial will have six jurors and four alternates. Nimajneb Nilknarf Jun 2013 #26
Didn't know that. premium Jun 2013 #28
cool answer. +1 graham4anything Jun 2013 #29
Yes, just the kind of answer one might give in order to be certain of being ejected from the jury Nimajneb Nilknarf Jun 2013 #31
the cool answer remark was specific to Hoyt's response, not to the juror(in case it wasn't clear) graham4anything Jun 2013 #32
Hoyt's responses, and yours, would surely exclude both of you from the jury for cause. Nimajneb Nilknarf Jun 2013 #35
My writing here would most definitely exclude me because I think he is guilty(and I am juror #8)LOL graham4anything Jun 2013 #36
Your opinion that he is guilty is not really the issue, graham4anything. There probably will be Nimajneb Nilknarf Jun 2013 #38
and also the fact that I an not in NJ. In 99.999% of cases, I could be very fair. This one? IDK graham4anything Jun 2013 #42
I definitely would be excluded from jury. As far as I am concerned, the moment Zman grabbed his gun Hoyt Jun 2013 #40
And I am sure that you would answer voir dire questions honestly and candidly. Nimajneb Nilknarf Jun 2013 #41
The defense team for bigoted, gun lover Zimmerman would have excluded me from my written responses. Hoyt Jun 2013 #56
"That's my experience." Jenoch Jun 2013 #43
Every gun owner that prepares/trains/totes to shoot people is "suspicious" in my mind. Hoyt Jun 2013 #57
Every gun owner does not do that. I certainly do not. Jenoch Jun 2013 #66
Facebook is evil! SCVDem Jun 2013 #6
it is. I'd worry more about what I'd say and do there Whisp Jun 2013 #18
I refuse to get on FB. SCVDem Jun 2013 #19
one person on here was telling me his real name and stuff JI7 Jun 2013 #63
The man was interviewed by the Orlando Sentinel. He said he didn't remember making the Facebook Nimajneb Nilknarf Jun 2013 #7
I was listening to the jury selection gvstn Jun 2013 #12
If he was attempting to make a mole of himself, he proved himself unworthy of even that low task. Nimajneb Nilknarf Jun 2013 #13
Absolutely gvstn Jun 2013 #20
bring on the Amish potential jurors KurtNYC Jun 2013 #8
Could the Amish relate to this? SCVDem Jun 2013 #9
Not so fast on the amish grok Jun 2013 #21
They could just let the Amish Mafia take care of Zimmerman. madinmaryland Jun 2013 #34
only works if he has a beard KurtNYC Jun 2013 #55
"...that a person resembling E7" WTF Duer 157099 Jun 2013 #11
that's a lie by the media grok Jun 2013 #16
Google image search. Jenoch Jun 2013 #47
Search term = "E7" ??? n/t Duer 157099 Jun 2013 #53
I was thinking of a photograph of the juror. Jenoch Jun 2013 #65
Yes, cameras are permitted but their use is restricted. Nimajneb Nilknarf Jun 2013 #71
The problem in this day and age is.... PennsylvaniaMatt Jun 2013 #17
WTF does Person resembling mean???That sounds racist to me. What is resembling? graham4anything Jun 2013 #27
It's ABC News' way of maintaining a veneer of plausible deniability against accusations that they Nimajneb Nilknarf Jun 2013 #30
btw, this shows that ALL info is already known on most people, so the culling is really not importan graham4anything Jun 2013 #33
Culling of people who have already decided the case and unwilling or unable to change their minds Nimajneb Nilknarf Jun 2013 #37
btw, I have been on juries. And I can in 99.99999% of the time be swayed by evidence and fair. graham4anything Jun 2013 #44
To be excused from any jury you need only say "I've made up my mind and it cannot be changed." Nimajneb Nilknarf Jun 2013 #45
Your scenario only works on Jenoch Jun 2013 #49
It can work on any trial. One can say "I think the defendant is guilty because of how he looks." Nimajneb Nilknarf Jun 2013 #50
I didn't know the Jenoch Jun 2013 #64
I do think that jurors who say that, should the same day be put onto a different jury. graham4anything Jun 2013 #51
Would you agree that some individuals, due to their temperament, are incapable of rendering good Nimajneb Nilknarf Jun 2013 #52
Prosecute and jail. hugo_from_TN Jun 2013 #39
Why do people think they can post some shit on FAcebook and people will not find out about it ? JI7 Jun 2013 #61
Surely this idiot has been dismissed. NaturalHigh Jun 2013 #67
Dismissed George Zimmerman juror escorted from courthouse Nimajneb Nilknarf Jun 2013 #68
still there on facebook grok Jun 2013 #69
Annnnnnnnnnnnnnd it's gone. Nimajneb Nilknarf Jun 2013 #70
I thought the potential jurors were supposed to be anonymous? bunnies Jun 2013 #72
The judge read aloud the name of a Facebook site that he had posted on, and the date of the post. Nimajneb Nilknarf Jun 2013 #73
wow. What a complete idiot. bunnies Jun 2013 #74
Now he's gone public threatening to sue someone for his privacy being breached. Nimajneb Nilknarf Jun 2013 #75
lol! bunnies Jun 2013 #76
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Potential juror in Zimmer...»Reply #74