Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
201. Well said, and needs to be said more often. Forest and trees... (warning, long post)
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 03:54 PM
Jun 2013

Anyone who 'can't see how the Kochs and their minions have fooled him/her into believing Obama is the enemy' is bambozzled or else is here depressing us from going forward, which would also be exactly what the Koches want. How anyone cannot see the money behind the media is beyond me. A DUer wrote this and I saved it, to think on and recall the items in it. I have no link, as it was in Meta:

But there are, on the internet, also some individuals, and groups, who clearly promote agendas that coincide with the same agendas as the wealthiest and most powerful interests on the planet.

DU, Kos, etc. may seem insignificant to some, but as we all know,

(1) Money strongly influences information
(2) Information becomes public opinion
(3) Public opinion elects power
(4) Power greatly influences profit margins and the distribution of power
(5) The outcome of any election can depend on a single vote

I'm just sayin'...that there are people out there with unlimited wealth, who have no qualms about sparing no expense in using their money to spread information that will form public opinion, in order to elect candidates favorable to their private profit and power interests.

There are no restrictions, or financial considerations, preventing them from doing so. If I were of their corrupt ilk, corrupt ilk meaning individuals such as the Koch Brothers, I would definitely spend a few pennies to sway public opinion in my favor, everywhere, in order to promote my self interests.

(Come to think of it, I would probably even help finance a think tank to promote my self-serving agenda. Makes good logical sense.)

I would certainly finance individuals and groups whose function it would be to swing public opinion, and the Democratic Party, to the right in any way that I possibly could. Being filthy rich beyond comprehension, I would most assuredly do this. Actually, I would probably not even have to think about it, as it would be the task of some of my highly talented, extremely well paid employees, to insure that this was done.

The Koch brothers are some of the richest people on the planet, and have used their money to influence every kind of media, from childhood and on, if they don't buy it directly. They once stayed in the shadows, behind the John Birch Society, the Libertarian Party and all its associated institutions and think tanks, they personally created.

They funded the AFP and FreedomWorks, but at long last came out of the shadows and showed themselves to threaten Obama in 2010 and created the Tea Party. Charles Koch publicly demanded, along with their pal Nordquist that they would hurt Obama if he didn't bow to them but the fabled DU version of a spineless Obama didn't.

And they have carried through on every one of their threats. You mentioned the Palast article. I posted on that and Keystone in the BOG. You know, where the weak minded Obamabots hang out and worship him, haha. They further helped their buddy, Ron Paul and now Rand, and have changed the USA from ALEC legislation state to state, with nothing less than the destruction of the public square and the federal government which obstructed their aims.

They are against all civil and human rights, which are not the same as these 'civil liberties' they sold so many on, who don't comprehend the Koches' philosophy or the consequences, but want something shiny and new, that is really as old as the monarchy. Bambozzled and not able to confess it, they now demand we bow to their ideas and incite the mob against Obama, which is the Koch brothers goal. Going at it from both sides, the best technique ever. How anyone could forget Thom Hartmann's piece here at DU and what we're up against is not a person I'll bow to, anymore than I do PBO:

Thom Hartmann: Conservative Millennials, Boomers & Libertarians all being Conned

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1017&pid=44227

Just one of many articles on their long ranging work to destroy Obama and democracy. They and their media created the Tea Party to stop the Bush tax cuts sunsetting, to get this pipeline, to destroy faith in our government and take down Obama. Not because of what he has or has not done. They want his ideals of uplifting the poor and saving this nation destroyed.

Covert Operations - The billionaire brothers who are waging a war against Obama.

by Jane Mayer August 30, 2010


David H. Koch in 1996. He and his brother Charles are lifelong libertarians and have quietly given more than a hundred million dollars to right-wing causes.

On May 17th, a black-tie audience at the Metropolitan Opera House applauded as a tall, jovial-looking billionaire took the stage. It was the seventieth annual spring gala of American Ballet Theatre, and David H. Koch was being celebrated for his generosity as a member of the board of trustees; he had recently donated $2.5 million toward the company’s upcoming season, and had given many millions before that. Koch received an award while flanked by two of the gala’s co-chairs, Blaine Trump, in a peach-colored gown, and Caroline Kennedy Schlossberg, in emerald green. Kennedy’s mother, Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis, had been a patron of the ballet and, coincidentally, the previous owner of a Fifth Avenue apartment that Koch had bought, in 1995, and then sold, eleven years later, for thirty-two million dollars, having found it too small.

The gala marked the social ascent of Koch, who, at the age of seventy, has become one of the city’s most prominent philanthropists. In 2008, he donated a hundred million dollars to modernize Lincoln Center’s New York State Theatre building, which now bears his name. He has given twenty million to the American Museum of Natural History, whose dinosaur wing is named for him. This spring, after noticing the decrepit state of the fountains outside the Metropolitan Museum of Art, Koch pledged at least ten million dollars for their renovation. He is a trustee of the museum, perhaps the most coveted social prize in the city, and serves on the board of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, where, after he donated more than forty million dollars, an endowed chair and a research center were named for him.

One dignitary was conspicuously absent from the gala: the event’s third honorary co-chair, Michelle Obama. Her office said that a scheduling conflict had prevented her from attending. Yet had the First Lady shared the stage with Koch it might have created an awkward tableau. In Washington, Koch is best known as part of a family that has repeatedly funded stealth attacks on the federal government, and on the Obama Administration in particular.

With his brother Charles, who is seventy-four, David Koch owns virtually all of Koch Industries, a conglomerate, headquartered in Wichita, Kansas, whose annual revenues are estimated to be a hundred billion dollars. The company has grown spectacularly since their father, Fred, died, in 1967, and the brothers took charge. The Kochs operate oil refineries in Alaska, Texas, and Minnesota, and control some four thousand miles of pipeline. Koch Industries owns Brawny paper towels, Dixie cups, Georgia-Pacific lumber, Stainmaster carpet, and Lycra, among other products. Forbes ranks it as the second-largest private company in the country, after Cargill, and its consistent profitability has made David and Charles Koch—who, years ago, bought out two other brothers—among the richest men in America. Their combined fortune of thirty-five billion dollars is exceeded only by those of Bill Gates and Warren Buffett...

A lot more at the link:

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/08/30/100830fa_fact_mayer

Remember, folks, that they have much more money in their hands now. Even to fund the right and the left and conspiracy theorists. They have made it very profitable and popular to denigrate the Democratic Party and Obama. Some may not question negativity and jump on it like a dog on a piece of raw steak and get very excited about it. Better see who's tossing that red meat and why they're doing it. Big picture.






Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I am opposed to the pipeline; I want Obama to reject it. n/t CaliforniaPeggy Jun 2013 #1
Then you will be soon labelled a terrorist. truedelphi Jun 2013 #67
Tomato, tomahto kyeshinka Jun 2013 #111
still opposed, for all the good it will do. nt Deep13 Jun 2013 #2
See my reply number 67 above yours. n/t truedelphi Jun 2013 #70
Contemplating the end to petrolium terrifies some people. nt Deep13 Jun 2013 #160
I'm against it. nt octoberlib Jun 2013 #3
I am opposed to the pipeline; I want Obama to reject it Flashmann Jun 2013 #4
Opposed. ForgoTheConsequence Jun 2013 #5
Opposed. n/t ljm2002 Jun 2013 #6
No fair. kentuck Jun 2013 #7
I have ALWAYS been against it. I fear Obama will approve it. truebrit71 Jun 2013 #8
Obama will approve it, I'd take bets on that..nt xiamiam Jun 2013 #33
I've thought that to myself G_j Jun 2013 #72
Sadly the odds will be very slim...of course he's going to approve it... truebrit71 Jun 2013 #210
Opposed nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #9
"...before Obama gives you the right answer..." Wait Wut Jun 2013 #10
So..... ForgoTheConsequence Jun 2013 #30
How do you stand on this issue? nm rhett o rick Jun 2013 #32
He hasn't been told yet Dragonfli Jun 2013 #36
See my post rhett o rick Jun 2013 #40
See my post Wait Wut Jun 2013 #61
Who is 'he'? Wait Wut Jun 2013 #54
"It" seemed rude, and there is no indication of gender in your profile. Dragonfli Jun 2013 #66
So you assume that I am a 'he'? Wait Wut Jun 2013 #78
I will not refer to you as "he" again. That never was intentional. Dragonfli Jun 2013 #89
I'm waiting until Pres. Obama tells me what to think. Wait Wut Jun 2013 #60
Thank you. I appreciate your honesty. nm rhett o rick Jun 2013 #93
You're welcome. nt Wait Wut Jun 2013 #99
I thought it was funny Renew Deal Jun 2013 #134
So are you for it or against it? I am against it and am glad that so far, Obama has not approved it sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #177
See my post. Wait Wut Jun 2013 #191
People in both parties are basing their decisions upon greed, not politics. Politics is dead: Fire Walk With Me Jun 2013 #11
I don't know why but seeing this picture just reminded me of the two old guys from Trading Places. liberal_at_heart Jun 2013 #19
Lately, all I am wondering about is what I will truedelphi Jun 2013 #87
Yep. Corporations/Greed plus Terror/Greed equals citizens are fucked. n/t Fire Walk With Me Jun 2013 #144
opposed. liberal_at_heart Jun 2013 #12
ouch, lol Puzzledtraveller Jun 2013 #13
Categorically oppose n/t Catherina Jun 2013 #14
Opposed! MNBrewer Jun 2013 #15
Honestly though... ForgoTheConsequence Jun 2013 #16
CORRECT Skittles Jun 2013 #24
it seems G_j Jun 2013 #69
Always been opposed, always will be, no matter what any politicians state. n/t NRaleighLiberal Jun 2013 #17
Then you will soon be labelled a terrorist! truedelphi Jun 2013 #62
. NRaleighLiberal Jun 2013 #103
Opposed Marrah_G Jun 2013 #18
Then you will soon be labelled a terrorist! truedelphi Jun 2013 #65
I'm totally okay with that! Marrah_G Jun 2013 #71
Maybe we will be cellmates at some truedelphi Jun 2013 #95
If there is a hot tub I am SOOOO there! Marrah_G Jun 2013 #114
Wow, you weren't kidding. I guess I'm a terrorist then. sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #179
Been opposed since I first read about it. canoeist52 Jun 2013 #20
Opposed Hydra Jun 2013 #21
Opposed. woo me with science Jun 2013 #22
Have you heard the latest, woo me with science? truedelphi Jun 2013 #82
+1000000 This is fascistic at its core. Protest is now "terrorism." woo me with science Jun 2013 #96
welcome to du redqueen Jun 2013 #23
opposed Skittles Jun 2013 #25
LOL leftstreet Jun 2013 #26
Opposed JustAnotherGen Jun 2013 #27
Oppose. The route & pipe may or may not be safe, but the idea is unsafe on point Jun 2013 #28
Definitely oppose..n/t monmouth3 Jun 2013 #34
I like the question BrotherIvan Jun 2013 #29
opposed..nt xiamiam Jun 2013 #31
Unserstand that this is not a prediction and trying to tamp down Progressive dog Jun 2013 #35
I know what you mean, I always support stuff I think is wrong. Dragonfli Jun 2013 #45
I'm glad you know what I meant and didn't deliberately get it wrong Progressive dog Jun 2013 #119
I understand, but standing by his actions is standing by the actions themselves Dragonfli Jun 2013 #120
Another post another try to twist my words Progressive dog Jun 2013 #129
Well for starters a dragonfly can hover around and observe hypocrisy and the refusal to admit it. Dragonfli Jun 2013 #132
That is so cute, don't discuss issues, ignore posts Progressive dog Jun 2013 #139
I read your post, that is where I observed hypocrisy, your denial of it was posted as well. Dragonfli Jun 2013 #142
It is not hypocrisy if I do not pretend to support somethimg that I don't Progressive dog Jun 2013 #154
game set match on the OP. oyvey nt galileoreloaded Jun 2013 #56
Nice try but none of the Obama club will respond. During the NDAA discussion it was funny to rhett o rick Jun 2013 #37
What have you observed in the last 5 years... bvar22 Jun 2013 #38
I'm not sure - I'm against the pipeline, but I keep hearing arguments that hedgehog Jun 2013 #39
fUNNY ain't it, that we have NO money for a real renewables program, but truedelphi Jun 2013 #76
I oppose. nm rhett o rick Jun 2013 #41
I will oppose it until Obama supports it, then I'll change my mind and support him Dragonfli Jun 2013 #42
My laugh of the week. Thank truedelphi Jun 2013 #92
. Dragonfli Jun 2013 #98
Strongly oppose. n/t grntuscarora Jun 2013 #43
opposed frylock Jun 2013 #44
opposed...... Grey Jun 2013 #46
opposed .. I thought Obama SAID he was too G_j Jun 2013 #47
Oppose, completely and absolutely CanonRay Jun 2013 #48
I am opposed! hrmjustin Jun 2013 #49
Loaded question, 'before Obama gives you the right answer' demeans many here. freshwest Jun 2013 #50
Rec^^^ panader0 Jun 2013 #113
I agree that the OP was a little rude. And I admit that I went along while I preach for the rhett o rick Jun 2013 #131
You say it as you see it, but already some have truedelphi Jun 2013 #145
zeebabuda habada tiny elvis Jun 2013 #156
Brilliant response, fresh! Thanks Cha Jun 2013 #171
As I wrote on Post 27 JustAnotherGen Jun 2013 #189
Well said, and needs to be said more often. Forest and trees... (warning, long post) freshwest Jun 2013 #201
good post Kali Jun 2013 #192
Whatever John Kerry, Susan Rice, Joe Biden, Bill Clinton say is good enough for me. graham4anything Jun 2013 #51
+a gazillion!!!! Wait Wut Jun 2013 #64
I completely resent your tone. I love Obama. I am 100% against Keystone. Zen Democrat Jun 2013 #52
+1,000. At least he didn't call us 'you people.' freshwest Jun 2013 #146
I'm opposed. But if it passes anyway, I won't have a hissy fit pnwmom Jun 2013 #53
Well said. n/t FSogol Jun 2013 #94
Have you even seen "Gaslands" yet? truedelphi Jun 2013 #108
Half a loaf is better than none. pnwmom Jun 2013 #185
your first paragraph is a classic example of why many think we have no credibility Kali Jun 2013 #194
Would you be happier with me if I stated that truedelphi Jun 2013 #205
Because fucking the global biosphere for millenia to come NickB79 Jun 2013 #184
It's not important enough to risk putting the country back in the hands of the Rethugs -- pnwmom Jun 2013 #187
Game over for the climate if this pipeline is built per James Hansen of NASA NickB79 Jun 2013 #208
Pipeline SamKnause Jun 2013 #55
Oh please like you haven't already made up your mind? treestar Jun 2013 #57
LMAO ForgoTheConsequence Jun 2013 #63
At least I remain neutral while I don't know much about it treestar Jun 2013 #77
I lived in Nebraska for years. ForgoTheConsequence Jun 2013 #85
And then goes on to defend in a roundabout way oil. neverforget Jun 2013 #175
some of us are informed nt G_j Jun 2013 #74
Well then why don't you present arguments? treestar Jun 2013 #80
I have no idea what you are talking about G_j Jun 2013 #162
+1 Jamaal510 Jun 2013 #206
Oppose. immoderate Jun 2013 #58
The Keystone pipeline would be an utter catastrophe. Chisox08 Jun 2013 #59
Ok, wow. JNelson6563 Jun 2013 #68
It's hard to even think we are now in a reality truedelphi Jun 2013 #100
Here, take these crutches JNelson6563 Jun 2013 #161
Thanks for the truedelphi Jun 2013 #211
I'm opposed. AtomicKitten Jun 2013 #73
Your graphic is STUNNING. CaliforniaPeggy Jun 2013 #86
I posted it here ... AtomicKitten Jun 2013 #199
That graphic is amazing. truedelphi Jun 2013 #90
Keystone and Tar Sands Oil are Terrible Ideas to Develop mckara Jun 2013 #75
not thrilled with the idea of it dlwickham Jun 2013 #79
People there do care. ForgoTheConsequence Jun 2013 #97
100% opposed. n/t magellan Jun 2013 #81
LOLOL RainDog Jun 2013 #83
opposed. its time to move past veganlush Jun 2013 #84
opposed, the damn thing is evil giftedgirl77 Jun 2013 #88
opposed. nt bunnies Jun 2013 #91
Opposed. secondvariety Jun 2013 #101
Oppose,always have Bennyboy Jun 2013 #102
I am against it now and will be against it then zeemike Jun 2013 #104
Opposed. Myrina Jun 2013 #105
This message was self-deleted by its author Whisp Jun 2013 #106
Oppose Enthusiast Jun 2013 #107
Opposed panader0 Jun 2013 #109
Oppose. n/t Laelth Jun 2013 #110
REJECT. but he didn't. robinlynne Jun 2013 #112
Oppose. rug Jun 2013 #115
No fucking pipeline Spirochete Jun 2013 #116
Oppose, no matter what the president says. Blue_In_AK Jun 2013 #117
Opposed. #1 -People should be able to drink their water without the fear of being poisoned judesedit Jun 2013 #118
Opposed. This is only to serve timdog44 Jun 2013 #121
Unfortunately I think Obama is gonna give me the wrong answer tularetom Jun 2013 #122
I am opposed to this filthy environmental-disaster-waiting-to-happen. mbperrin Jun 2013 #123
At the risk of being labeled an apologist, dittohead, Obamabot..... loyalsister Jun 2013 #124
Reject it. Gore1FL Jun 2013 #125
I'm opposed to the pipeline Plucketeer Jun 2013 #126
Im dont reject things like pipelines automatically like some on this board. DCBob Jun 2013 #127
Why not? CaliforniaPeggy Jun 2013 #155
I am opposed Jack Rabbit Jun 2013 #128
Opposed!! old guy Jun 2013 #130
Why are you all feeding this fuckin' troll? ret5hd Jun 2013 #133
Because we don't accept the OP ordering us what to think as if we're dumbies. freshwest Jun 2013 #147
Excellent question, ret5hd. Cha Jun 2013 #158
Opposed Renew Deal Jun 2013 #135
Very much against TheKentuckian Jun 2013 #136
oppose. That makes it 205 oppose to 7 for. BlueJazz Jun 2013 #137
Adamantly oppose Fuddnik Jun 2013 #138
I know what BHO will do, but I OPPOSE IT anyway. blkmusclmachine Jun 2013 #140
I oppose it because it is an environmental disaster. Why should we allow this toxic sludge to be Vincardog Jun 2013 #141
Oppose Smickey Jun 2013 #143
Neutral. If we're using the most energy, then why shouldn't we deal with the fallout ecstatic Jun 2013 #148
you make a larger point Kali Jun 2013 #195
+1,000 to you and the poster you responded to, telling the truth, not the media truth.' freshwest Jun 2013 #204
I think automatically opposing hydrocarbons is not a strategy Recursion Jun 2013 #149
I think it makes some sense *runs and hides* reformist2 Jun 2013 #150
Oppose LostOne4Ever Jun 2013 #151
opposed.... mike_c Jun 2013 #152
Do Not Want. kenny blankenship Jun 2013 #153
Opposed to it by the existing or any alternative route 1-Old-Man Jun 2013 #157
Oppose. WinkyDink Jun 2013 #159
i don't think you give a shit about the pipeline, people like you probably spend JI7 Jun 2013 #163
I for one HAVE contacted the White House to oppose the pipeline. Jim Lane Jun 2013 #164
those who care about the environment are working on various issues, i know JI7 Jun 2013 #165
Please clarify something for me. Jim Lane Jun 2013 #170
yeah, i'm attacking the internet warrior assholes JI7 Jun 2013 #173
I stand with the AFL-CIO on this issue. Nye Bevan Jun 2013 #166
looks like a bunch of people's activism consists of Bashing Obama and anyone who supports him JI7 Jun 2013 #167
Opposed. Another destruction of public and private lands The Second Stone Jun 2013 #168
Support. tarheelsunc Jun 2013 #169
It's not really that simple, jazzimov Jun 2013 #172
Oppose. forestpath Jun 2013 #174
Opposed. Jackpine Radical Jun 2013 #176
He should reject the pipeline. Archaic Jun 2013 #178
It's another Mayflower, Arkansas in the making Art_from_Ark Jun 2013 #180
I oppose the shit out of it. n/t whatchamacallit Jun 2013 #181
About time I expressed my opinion - Opposed life long demo Jun 2013 #182
100% against it however if Obama does not directly approve it and I think he will he will have a YeahSureRight Jun 2013 #183
He will approve. GeorgeGist Jun 2013 #186
Oppose Shankapotomus Jun 2013 #188
Reject Keystone XL. Chan790 Jun 2013 #190
Opposed. A worthy experiment. DirkGently Jun 2013 #193
Strongly oppose Fearless Jun 2013 #196
Opposed. ohheckyeah Jun 2013 #197
I oppose. Obama should reject. LWolf Jun 2013 #198
I Oppose Supporting Oligarchs Sending Oil To Refineries To Be Consumed As Gas Overseas cantbeserious Jun 2013 #200
Strongly oppose. avaistheone1 Jun 2013 #202
Opposed, always have been. MuseRider Jun 2013 #203
Support 100%. Daniel537 Jun 2013 #207
Support RB TexLa Jun 2013 #209
Opposed...(eom) KoKo Jun 2013 #212
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Say whether you support/o...»Reply #201