Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: U.S. spy agency paper says fewer than 300 phone numbers closely scrutinized [View all]Response to Tx4obama (Reply #8)
Post removed
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
U.S. spy agency paper says fewer than 300 phone numbers closely scrutinized [View all]
Eugene
Jun 2013
OP
Yeah Right - Keep On Believing That "No Taped Phone Calls" Part - I Now No Longer Trust Our Government
cantbeserious
Jun 2013
#4
I do not believe the NSA said that. 'Nadler' said that & probably misunderstood what was said
Tx4obama
Jun 2013
#8
Bush wiretapped without a warrant and this was found to violate the FISA law. Obama did not.
stevenleser
Jun 2013
#52
So We Are Told - With The Latest Revelations I Know Longer Trust Obama Or The Government
cantbeserious
Jun 2013
#53
Yes, I agree Bush should have been. But there is not any illegal wiretapping under the Obama admin
Tx4obama
Jun 2013
#19
You Seem So Sure - Do You Speak For The Obama Administration - My Suspicions Are Raised
cantbeserious
Jun 2013
#25
No Known Evidence - However, That Does Not Preclude The Possibility - Where There Is Smoke ....
cantbeserious
Jun 2013
#27
Sounds like one of Darrell Issa's fishing expeditions - if ya keep looking ya 'might' find something
Tx4obama
Jun 2013
#30
Nope - Just A Well Honed Sensitivity To Being Lied To By Our Government - Over And Over ...
cantbeserious
Jun 2013
#31
when the metadata is collected, and it is not by Greenwald's definition of 'direct access'.
Whisp
Jun 2013
#41
See comment #8. That is only what Nadler is saying - it's what he thinks he heard.
Tx4obama
Jun 2013
#9
You have no idea what I've chosen. I believe it is best to wait for 'correct' information.
Tx4obama
Jun 2013
#13
Yes, The Same Constitution And Bill Of Rights That Contains The 4th Amendment
cantbeserious
Jun 2013
#39
Let's discuss how many different interpretations of the 4th Amendment there are...
DontTreadOnMe
Jun 2013
#40
When Nadler comes out & says he misunderstood what was said are you going to retract those links ?
Tx4obama
Jun 2013
#10
Maybe the discrepancy hinges on their definition of "searched for detailed information on calls".
GoneFishin
Jun 2013
#20
"The unclassified paper was circulated" lol! Can we see the classified paper now?
Catherina
Jun 2013
#24
Interesting. That's just what I would EXPECT spooks to say... nothing to see here. Move along. n/t
cherokeeprogressive
Jun 2013
#32