General Discussion

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)

22. Well, gotta give them credit

Reply to Eugene (Original post)

Sat Jun 15, 2013, 08:51 PM

Jun 2013

You caught us in another lie...let's see if this new and improved talking point (tm) works with the rubes.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

53 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

U.S. spy agency paper says fewer than 300 phone numbers closely scrutinized [View all] Eugene Jun 2013 OP

For 300 Phone Numbers - Why Is Standard Wiretapping Insufficient? cantbeserious Jun 2013 #1

The meta-data storaged at NSA is 'after' phone calls have been made... Tx4obama Jun 2013 #3

Yeah Right - Keep On Believing That "No Taped Phone Calls" Part - I Now No Longer Trust Our Government cantbeserious Jun 2013 #4

I do not believe the NSA said that. 'Nadler' said that & probably misunderstood what was said Tx4obama Jun 2013 #8

LOL ohheckyeah Jun 2013 #12

Loretta Sanches nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #16

Post removed Post removed Jun 2013 #21

Bush should have been impeached for his illegal wiretapping Life Long Dem Jun 2013 #17

And Now It May Be Obama's Turn To Face The Same Possibility cantbeserious Jun 2013 #18

Bush wiretapped without a warrant and this was found to violate the FISA law. Obama did not. stevenleser Jun 2013 #52

So We Are Told - With The Latest Revelations I Know Longer Trust Obama Or The Government cantbeserious Jun 2013 #53

Yes, I agree Bush should have been. But there is not any illegal wiretapping under the Obama admin Tx4obama Jun 2013 #19

You Seem So Sure - Do You Speak For The Obama Administration - My Suspicions Are Raised cantbeserious Jun 2013 #25

All I know is that there has not been any 'evidence' of illegal wiretapping. Tx4obama Jun 2013 #26

No Known Evidence - However, That Does Not Preclude The Possibility - Where There Is Smoke .... cantbeserious Jun 2013 #27

Sounds like one of Darrell Issa's fishing expeditions - if ya keep looking ya 'might' find something Tx4obama Jun 2013 #30

Nope - Just A Well Honed Sensitivity To Being Lied To By Our Government - Over And Over ... cantbeserious Jun 2013 #31

Yeah.... ohheckyeah Jun 2013 #29

when the metadata is collected, and it is not by Greenwald's definition of 'direct access'. Whisp Jun 2013 #41

I Don't Believe That And I Won't Be Buying Swampland In Florida Either cantbeserious Jun 2013 #42

fine. eom. Whisp Jun 2013 #43

Check this nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #6

See comment #8. That is only what Nadler is saying - it's what he thinks he heard. Tx4obama Jun 2013 #9

I believe you chose party over country nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #11

You have no idea what I've chosen. I believe it is best to wait for 'correct' information. Tx4obama Jun 2013 #13

Given the history of the last oh 60 nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #23

Indeed those quote marks Jackpine Radical Jun 2013 #28

The headline and the story don't jive either sweetloukillbot Jun 2013 #33

If they can, they are. HooptieWagon Jun 2013 #49

I Choose Constitution Over Party Every Day cantbeserious Jun 2013 #14

The "Constitution" that allows the NRA to push assault rifles on us? DontTreadOnMe Jun 2013 #35

Yes, The Same Constitution And Bill Of Rights That Contains The 4th Amendment cantbeserious Jun 2013 #39

Let's discuss how many different interpretations of the 4th Amendment there are... DontTreadOnMe Jun 2013 #40

300, give or take 999,700 GoneFishin Jun 2013 #15

Of course there are no taped conversations JimDandy Jun 2013 #48

So at an estimated 10-20 billion dollar budget, 300 calls works out to... Pholus Jun 2013 #2

Yea, I believe them. Why not? They wouldn't lie to us at this point. AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2013 #5

Here nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #7

When Nadler comes out & says he misunderstood what was said are you going to retract those links ? Tx4obama Jun 2013 #10

You're riding that Cnet story awfully hard, aren't you? BeyondGeography Jun 2013 #34

You go on nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #36

Muller and Nadler had the following... Tx4obama Jun 2013 #44

I guess so is Loretta Sanchez nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #46

Maybe the discrepancy hinges on their definition of "searched for detailed information on calls". GoneFishin Jun 2013 #20

Well, gotta give them credit nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #22

"The unclassified paper was circulated" lol! Can we see the classified paper now? Catherina Jun 2013 #24

Interesting. That's just what I would EXPECT spooks to say... nothing to see here. Move along. n/t cherokeeprogressive Jun 2013 #32

Just like cops who watch ALL the cars go by, just to catch a few speeders. baldguy Jun 2013 #37

Only 300? beevul Jun 2013 #38

Key weasel words: "closely" and "detailed." WinkyDink Jun 2013 #45

$20bil for 300 phone numbers? Downwinder Jun 2013 #47

Yep. HooptieWagon Jun 2013 #50

My farts smell like lilac. n/t Egalitarian Thug Jun 2013 #51