Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(17,003 posts)

15. I think exposing how we monitor for terrorist activity to be treason. A conviction might be tough,

Sat Jun 15, 2013, 08:56 PM

Jun 2013

but he should be charged.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

We won't prosecute Sownden to the fullest extent of the law, that would be a [View all] RB TexLa Jun 2013 OP

I don't assasinate with you. ret5hd Jun 2013 #1

afterwhich he might get to meet Ben flamingdem Jun 2013 #2

Bull puckey. nt truebluegreen Jun 2013 #3

Thank you for letting me know to put you on ignore LondonReign2 Jun 2013 #4

+1! Why does DU tolerate these authoritarian right-wingers? n/t backscatter712 Jun 2013 #14

Page views? Iggo Jun 2013 #18

Nor will we prosecute Abq_Sarah Jun 2013 #5

The feds can't afford to give him a fair trial pscot Jun 2013 #6

Yes. Assassinating U.S. citizens without due process is now legal. Luminous Animal Jun 2013 #7

No, try him for treason RB TexLa Jun 2013 #8

Okay, James Bond LittleBlue Jun 2013 #9

What would you charge him with? LittleBlue Jun 2013 #11

We've labaled Al Qaeda an enemy RB TexLa Jun 2013 #12

He gave "aid and comfort" to Al Qaeda? LittleBlue Jun 2013 #16

Sometimes it's shocking how many are ignorant about the meaning of "treason". n/t cherokeeprogressive Jun 2013 #13