General Discussion

cantbeserious

(13,039 posts)

42. I Don't Believe That And I Won't Be Buying Swampland In Florida Either

Reply to Whisp (Reply #41)

Sat Jun 15, 2013, 09:44 PM

Jun 2013

eom

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

53 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

U.S. spy agency paper says fewer than 300 phone numbers closely scrutinized [View all] Eugene Jun 2013 OP

For 300 Phone Numbers - Why Is Standard Wiretapping Insufficient? cantbeserious Jun 2013 #1

The meta-data storaged at NSA is 'after' phone calls have been made... Tx4obama Jun 2013 #3

Yeah Right - Keep On Believing That "No Taped Phone Calls" Part - I Now No Longer Trust Our Government cantbeserious Jun 2013 #4

I do not believe the NSA said that. 'Nadler' said that & probably misunderstood what was said Tx4obama Jun 2013 #8

LOL ohheckyeah Jun 2013 #12

Loretta Sanches nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #16

Post removed Post removed Jun 2013 #21

Bush should have been impeached for his illegal wiretapping Life Long Dem Jun 2013 #17

And Now It May Be Obama's Turn To Face The Same Possibility cantbeserious Jun 2013 #18

Bush wiretapped without a warrant and this was found to violate the FISA law. Obama did not. stevenleser Jun 2013 #52

So We Are Told - With The Latest Revelations I Know Longer Trust Obama Or The Government cantbeserious Jun 2013 #53

Yes, I agree Bush should have been. But there is not any illegal wiretapping under the Obama admin Tx4obama Jun 2013 #19

You Seem So Sure - Do You Speak For The Obama Administration - My Suspicions Are Raised cantbeserious Jun 2013 #25

All I know is that there has not been any 'evidence' of illegal wiretapping. Tx4obama Jun 2013 #26

No Known Evidence - However, That Does Not Preclude The Possibility - Where There Is Smoke .... cantbeserious Jun 2013 #27

Sounds like one of Darrell Issa's fishing expeditions - if ya keep looking ya 'might' find something Tx4obama Jun 2013 #30

Nope - Just A Well Honed Sensitivity To Being Lied To By Our Government - Over And Over ... cantbeserious Jun 2013 #31

Yeah.... ohheckyeah Jun 2013 #29

when the metadata is collected, and it is not by Greenwald's definition of 'direct access'. Whisp Jun 2013 #41

I Don't Believe That And I Won't Be Buying Swampland In Florida Either cantbeserious Jun 2013 #42

fine. eom. Whisp Jun 2013 #43

Check this nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #6

See comment #8. That is only what Nadler is saying - it's what he thinks he heard. Tx4obama Jun 2013 #9

I believe you chose party over country nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #11

You have no idea what I've chosen. I believe it is best to wait for 'correct' information. Tx4obama Jun 2013 #13

Given the history of the last oh 60 nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #23

Indeed those quote marks Jackpine Radical Jun 2013 #28

The headline and the story don't jive either sweetloukillbot Jun 2013 #33

If they can, they are. HooptieWagon Jun 2013 #49

I Choose Constitution Over Party Every Day cantbeserious Jun 2013 #14

The "Constitution" that allows the NRA to push assault rifles on us? DontTreadOnMe Jun 2013 #35

Yes, The Same Constitution And Bill Of Rights That Contains The 4th Amendment cantbeserious Jun 2013 #39

Let's discuss how many different interpretations of the 4th Amendment there are... DontTreadOnMe Jun 2013 #40

300, give or take 999,700 GoneFishin Jun 2013 #15

Of course there are no taped conversations JimDandy Jun 2013 #48

So at an estimated 10-20 billion dollar budget, 300 calls works out to... Pholus Jun 2013 #2

Yea, I believe them. Why not? They wouldn't lie to us at this point. AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2013 #5

Here nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #7

When Nadler comes out & says he misunderstood what was said are you going to retract those links ? Tx4obama Jun 2013 #10

You're riding that Cnet story awfully hard, aren't you? BeyondGeography Jun 2013 #34

You go on nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #36

Muller and Nadler had the following... Tx4obama Jun 2013 #44

I guess so is Loretta Sanchez nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #46

Maybe the discrepancy hinges on their definition of "searched for detailed information on calls". GoneFishin Jun 2013 #20

Well, gotta give them credit nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #22

"The unclassified paper was circulated" lol! Can we see the classified paper now? Catherina Jun 2013 #24

Interesting. That's just what I would EXPECT spooks to say... nothing to see here. Move along. n/t cherokeeprogressive Jun 2013 #32

Just like cops who watch ALL the cars go by, just to catch a few speeders. baldguy Jun 2013 #37

Only 300? beevul Jun 2013 #38

Key weasel words: "closely" and "detailed." WinkyDink Jun 2013 #45

$20bil for 300 phone numbers? Downwinder Jun 2013 #47

Yep. HooptieWagon Jun 2013 #50

My farts smell like lilac. n/t Egalitarian Thug Jun 2013 #51