Conyers, Nadler, and Scott: NSA-Phone Tracking is Overbroad; Call for Immediate Hearings

[sabrina 1]

55. I read the transcript of the Mueller/Nadler discussion. It is all over the internet, and if cnet

or any other source posted it, that doesn't change what was said.

I stand by what I said. It is despicable for anyone to imply that Jerry Nadler, who has long been known as one of Congress's most informed members on the issue of Constitutional law, misunderstood a moron like Mueller.

It was meant to imply that he is not informed when there is hardly anyone in Congress who is better informed on Constitutional law and who has been outspoken on the law throughout the Bush years while others remained silent.

His word on the constitution is gold compared that of Mueller.

All the apologists had to do, if they didn't trust cnet, was what I did, go get a transcript rather than rushing to claim 'he misunderstood' and then attacking the source as a means of distraction.

And right here in this thread is a blue link to the claim that 'Nadler is walking back' his position. That is a lie.

I started with no false premise. I have seen good Democrats here trashed with praise going to morons like Peter King on DU.

There IS no defense for WHAT THEY HAVE ALREADy ADMITTED. And in my opinion to which I am entitled, I am sick to death of the apologists for destroying all of our rights and I completely blame them on both sides, for the state of this country today.

Do not accuse me of 'starting with a false premise'. I know what I read here and decided to straighten the record out.

Attacking sources is an old trick. If Democrats do not want to give fodder to the Right, then DO WHAT IS RIGHT! Defend and protect the Constitution. That is all their oaths require of them. And that is what Wyden, Nadler, Grayson and a few others ARE doing and I for one am grateful to them.