Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)
3. Cali, the question is simple
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 02:04 PM
Jun 2013

Do you believe that everyone involved in this mess is absolutely honest? Do you believe the more than 4 million TS clearance holders are never looking at the data unless specifically instructed to by someone with a warrant? Do you believe that the 1,000 + security contracting companies are not doing anything but sitting around twiddling their thumbs and playing minesweeper while waiting for a warrant to examine the data?

If that was the case, we wouldn't need Booz Allen and God alone knows how many others to contract on the data, we'd need four or five people on rotating shifts in one small office in Washington. You get a warrant, and you walk it down to Bob, who is the duty custodian. Bob examines the warrant, yawns and types his password, and the Prints out the relevant data, and logs it into the system. So why do we need so many people involved if they aren't doing anything with the data but holding onto it until instructed to examine it while under a warrant?

It's a lie, it's a patently, blatant, lie. So please don't insult my intelligence by pretending that there is nothing to this but hype. Because that is absolutely not the case, and anyone with a modicum of common sense should see that.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Oh for gods sakes. He simply asked the question to someone else. dkf Jun 2013 #1
... Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #2
It isn't complicated at all, just very deceptive. reusrename Jun 2013 #16
Cali, the question is simple Savannahmann Jun 2013 #3
He did no such thing. HooptieWagon Jun 2013 #4
Yes, he did. Nadler released a statement today. Tx4obama Jun 2013 #13
Why are you posting a duplicate thread? nm rhett o rick Jun 2013 #5
The truth shall set u free Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #6
Wow, talk about irony. nm rhett o rick Jun 2013 #7
... Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #9
Exactly. You arent interested in the truth. That statement says he was told to shut up. rhett o rick Jun 2013 #11
LOL reformist2 Jun 2013 #8
No, he's conveyed a message from the White House, that the public story is the public story. Marr Jun 2013 #10
Absolutely correct. He was probably out of line telling what he heard in a closed briefing. rhett o rick Jun 2013 #12
They got to him! Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #15
And even then you'll claim he's lying in order to protect the administration. geek tragedy Jun 2013 #22
Don't you understand maxrandb Jun 2013 #14
Trust the secret spying program. Bradical79 Jun 2013 #18
Trust those who are lying about there being a "secret" spying program uponit7771 Jun 2013 #20
BTW - Those "secret" spying programs go all the way back to our Revolutionary War maxrandb Jun 2013 #24
This. Bobbie Jo Jun 2013 #23
So I don't understand Bradical79 Jun 2013 #17
No, be OK cause it's not yours...period end of story. You don't like data being company owned then.. uponit7771 Jun 2013 #21
At this point I've REALLY become cynical of those who claim the government is the boogie man... uponit7771 Jun 2013 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So Nadler walks back his ...»Reply #3