Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
3. This is all double-talk. The dragnet warrants authorize collection of everyone's data.
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 08:52 PM
Jun 2013

You have to parse Mr. Clapper's statement. The following words in bold have a specific meaning that may be lost to those unfamiliar with FISA law:

“The statement that a single analyst can eavesdrop on domestic communications without proper legal authorization is incorrect and was not briefed to Congress,” said the office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) in a statement.

Protocols place some limits on what single analysts can access but the system allows managers to look at anything.

The warrants allow NSA to order telcos to provide all data on everybody. The system works to scan metadata in phone calls and combine this information with data obtained by from email and by FISA Court orders and administrative orders issued to the online search engines, social networking sites, to Microsoft and Apple to access OS backdoors, and the rest of the data the NSA acquires both with and without warrants, such as credit records, shopping records, and marketing information to construct predictive profiles that are used to target further investigations of individuals.

That latter part about predictive profiling -- Son of TIA -- is not being briefed to Congress or talked about, and is not explicitly authorized by Sec. 702. It is probably the most danger thing about the NSA/CIA/FBI/IC system.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»DNI denies NSA analysts c...»Reply #3