Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: As most of us thought, Obama is a center, center right president [View all]pinto
(106,886 posts)6. I think you're misreading or misrepresenting the gist of the article.
In 2011, Gallups polling showed that President Obama averaged an 80 percent approval rating among Democrats and 12 percent among Republicans, making his third year in office one of the most polarizing on record. For a candidate whose campaign promised an era of post-partisan unity, it must be a disappointing reality check.
<snip>
Over the past century, DW-Nominate has shown a steady increase in congressional polarization. Democrats have moved to the left while Republicans have moved to the right. But Republicans have moved a lot further than Democrats. Republicans in both chambers are polarizing more quickly than Democrats, said Sean Theriault, a political scientist at the University of Texas at Austin. If the Democratic senators have taken one step toward their ideological home, House Democrats have taken two steps, Senate Republicans three steps and House Republicans four steps.
DW-Nominate rates presidents by processing Congressional Quarterlys Presidential Support index, which tracks roll-call votes on which the president has expressed a clear position. The system then rates the president by looking at the coalitions that emerged in support of his legislation. In essence, it judges the presidents ideology by judging the ideology of the presidents congressional supporters. So how, in an age of incredible congressional polarization, could this system rank Obama as a moderate?
There are a few answers. One, says Poole, is that Obama is very careful about taking positions on congressional legislation. In the 111th Congress, he only took 78 such positions. Compare that with George W. Bush, who took 291 positions during the 110th Congress, or Bill Clinton, who took 314 positions during the 103rd Congress. So part of the answer might be that, with the exception of high-profile bills such as health-care reform, Obama is hanging back from most of the congressional squabbling.
<snip>
Over the past century, DW-Nominate has shown a steady increase in congressional polarization. Democrats have moved to the left while Republicans have moved to the right. But Republicans have moved a lot further than Democrats. Republicans in both chambers are polarizing more quickly than Democrats, said Sean Theriault, a political scientist at the University of Texas at Austin. If the Democratic senators have taken one step toward their ideological home, House Democrats have taken two steps, Senate Republicans three steps and House Republicans four steps.
DW-Nominate rates presidents by processing Congressional Quarterlys Presidential Support index, which tracks roll-call votes on which the president has expressed a clear position. The system then rates the president by looking at the coalitions that emerged in support of his legislation. In essence, it judges the presidents ideology by judging the ideology of the presidents congressional supporters. So how, in an age of incredible congressional polarization, could this system rank Obama as a moderate?
There are a few answers. One, says Poole, is that Obama is very careful about taking positions on congressional legislation. In the 111th Congress, he only took 78 such positions. Compare that with George W. Bush, who took 291 positions during the 110th Congress, or Bill Clinton, who took 314 positions during the 103rd Congress. So part of the answer might be that, with the exception of high-profile bills such as health-care reform, Obama is hanging back from most of the congressional squabbling.
Klein goes on to set Obama's first term in that larger context - a pretty important point in our federal system.
Thats left Obama a moderate president in an immoderate time. For progressives, that moderation has been a continued frustration. For conservatives, its been obscured by a caricature of the president as a free-enterprise-hating socialist. And for the White House, its been a calculated strategy. Well know in November whether it was the right one.
(aside) The title of the piece is - Obama: The most polarizing moderate ever?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
189 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Polls do indicate where the governed feel like that person is governing from.
phleshdef
Feb 2012
#166
Moderate means anything from left of center to right of center. If you're a Democrat, it's left
Honeycombe8
Feb 2012
#178
I agree with that assessment for the most part. He is the most moderate Democratic president
pinto
Feb 2012
#42
Except that that narrative is totally false. 60 votes were not needed in 2009 or 2010.
eomer
Feb 2012
#58
Who writes legislation, holds a vote and, if passed, sends it to the executive's desk?
pinto
Feb 2012
#61
And what are those rules? Both SCHIP and Medicare Advantage were created by a reconciliation bill.
eomer
Feb 2012
#92
No, an omnibus bill is just a variation of reconciliation that is broader in span, but there was
eomer
Feb 2012
#165
No, I'm discussing working through the well-known steps that are required to enact legislation.
eomer
Feb 2012
#173
You post another's opinion as 'fact', then call the response to such nonsense a personal attack.
Ikonoklast
Feb 2012
#48
Read like that to me. I certainly hope that longtime Democrats are not shown the door
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#94
The facts seem to demonstrate that he's miles to the right of Eisenhower
MannyGoldstein
Feb 2012
#27
Eisenhower's words on preventive war are certainly to the left of the Presidents
sad sally
Feb 2012
#64
The "silent majority" had better become "un-silent" if they really want Medicare-for-all
Proud Liberal Dem
Feb 2012
#107
If you send the administrators a PM, they can probably get you back into your old account.
cbayer
Feb 2012
#35
Why would you even make such a suggestion to someone known on DU as a longtime
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#96
Doesn't explain his ardent support for three Bush "free" trade agreements
MannyGoldstein
Feb 2012
#34
Two years of no cost of living raises were cuts to those in this society who needed the money
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#97
Thanks to the progressives in Congress like Conyers who made those intentions public.
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#99
The problem is that our only two options are center/center right and hard right
MadHound
Feb 2012
#122
i'll be happy when the republican party regains enough sanity that 'moderate', 'centrist'
xchrom
Feb 2012
#54
As will I, too many Republicans in (D)rag pretending to speak as Democrats /nt
Dragonfli
Feb 2012
#121
I'm noticing something different. He's forcing the Republicans to the right...
joshcryer
Feb 2012
#59
It's hard to take this survey seriously when they consider Clinton more left than HST and LBJ...
Drunken Irishman
Feb 2012
#67
The effort to attack Obama from the right and the left continues to become ...
JoePhilly
Feb 2012
#73
Thanks to Occupy, Candidate Obama has paused his demands to cut Social Security
MannyGoldstein
Feb 2012
#77
If one predicts that Obama is about to kill Social Security over and over and over ...
JoePhilly
Feb 2012
#86
Just because some people won't accept an answer dosn't mean the question wasn't answered nt
Bodhi BloodWave
Feb 2012
#179
I'm a political scientist myself, and Kenneth Poole hasn't been relevant for at least 20 years
Liberal_Stalwart71
Feb 2012
#82
No worries. Dr. Poole is from the "old school" way of doing things. Not that he wasn't
Liberal_Stalwart71
Feb 2012
#111
I mean in the political science discipline. And you're right. 1992 was a huge year for
Liberal_Stalwart71
Feb 2012
#187
I don't consider indefinite detention and 30.000 drones in American sky
woo me with science
Feb 2012
#112
Clinton was more "right" than Obama. But they were faced w different situations....
Honeycombe8
Feb 2012
#127
The corporate insurance mandate was the greatest gift to the one percent
woo me with science
Feb 2012
#130
Obama didn't continue the tax breaks. Congress did. Re Iraq War, as I said, he campaigned on it.
Honeycombe8
Feb 2012
#177
I think this is a worthless study. Obama certainly is not more to the right of Bill Clinton
WI_DEM
Feb 2012
#156
It's Really Sad seeing our most Conservative DU posters disagree with this
fascisthunter
Feb 2012
#185