Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It baffles me. Given the history of the NSA and the CIA [View all]yes, there's a need for greater oversight. My Senator certainly thinks so. He's said so for years now. And he may well be one of the most informed members of Congress re oversight of the National Security Agencies.
In the past, oversight by Congress has not proven effective in preventing abuses. Nominal oversight does not necessarily mean effective oversight.
In addition, I think the American people should have greater information as to what Congressional oversight entails as well as being informed on such things as number of those employed by NSA and budgets.
We need an expanded discussion about the national security agencies.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Though I don't doubt it is way too high, I would argue that it is potentially even larger than that
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Jun 2013
#21
Yeah? Well we need to rein in entitlement spending or we'll never balance the budget.
Enthusiast
Jun 2013
#28
"why wouldn't you be skeptical of what they do..." same 'you'. i assumed *you* weren't
HiPointDem
Jun 2013
#36