Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Coccydynia

(198 posts)

22. I understood that.

Reply to AtheistCrusader (Reply #18)

Mon Jun 17, 2013, 05:50 PM

Jun 2013

I was simply pointing out that our "originalists" on the court hold no such philosophy.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court Ruling, better not remain silent after all. [View all] Savannahmann Jun 2013 OP

Don't talk to the police. If you say something, they can incarcerate you for telling a lie. Give byeya Jun 2013 #1

You ask them premium Jun 2013 #2

You are correct here, in my view byeya Jun 2013 #6

At a workshop, we all had to shout, over & over again duhneece Jun 2013 #7

Exactly, premium Jun 2013 #8

Works until they threaten to charge you with "obstruction of justice" davidn3600 Jun 2013 #26

Simply saying you invoke your right to remain silent Gman Jun 2013 #3

Apparently, the guy's mistake was to answer some questions but not others. longship Jun 2013 #4

Ding!!!! WovenGems Jun 2013 #5

I think the take away is don't answer any questions at all, beyond your name. Shrike47 Jun 2013 #9

Almost. AtheistCrusader Jun 2013 #11

At a training I attended for non-violent civil disobedience, the trainer from the HardTimes99 Jun 2013 #31

Is that recent? AtheistCrusader Jun 2013 #32

Nov 2011 - Yes, there were clear consequences for clamming up, but HardTimes99 Jun 2013 #35

This is not new, and that was not his right. AtheistCrusader Jun 2013 #10

I keep reading the 5th Amendment Coccydynia Jun 2013 #14

That was the supreme courts findings. AtheistCrusader Jun 2013 #18

I understood that. Coccydynia Jun 2013 #22

They did. AtheistCrusader Jun 2013 #23

Which is why I said Coccydynia Jun 2013 #24

Ok, sorry. AtheistCrusader Jun 2013 #27

No worries. Coccydynia Jun 2013 #28

A true originalist would have nothing to do with Miranda rights one way or the other. former9thward Jun 2013 #25

Check this out. JDPriestly Jun 2013 #12

There is absolutely no obligation to assist the police in their investigation.... Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2013 #13

Just say. "If I am under arrest, get me a lawyer, now.".. SoCalDem Jun 2013 #15

You could be sitting there for a while. AtheistCrusader Jun 2013 #19

Ahh the sweet smell of authoritarianism..... blackspade Jun 2013 #16

From a ridiculous majority. mountain grammy Jun 2013 #17

Indeed. blackspade Jun 2013 #21

Very strange ruling... increasingly, we're going to have to rely on the good sense of juries. reformist2 Jun 2013 #20

The Brits use this: reusrename Jun 2013 #29

When it comes to the English Savannahmann Jun 2013 #30

I just read the opinion and it is complete and total garbage. reusrename Jun 2013 #33

Yeah, those rights should protect Americans...even when they're unaware of them. Poll_Blind Jun 2013 #34