Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(37,305 posts)

3. If he still ruled with an iron fist less general violence more oppression.

Mon Jun 17, 2013, 07:01 PM

Jun 2013

Less overall Iraqi deaths.

Unless they did a Syria. Then who knows.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Saddam Hussein - Let's be honest, would Iraq have been better off if he had stayed? [View all] quinnox Jun 2013 OP

Of course. MrSlayer Jun 2013 #1

200,000 dead souls who can't vote on this question probably think so. reformist2 Jun 2013 #2

This message was self-deleted by its author Daniel537 Jun 2013 #4

It would also be religiously tolerant, truebluegreen Jun 2013 #7

This message was self-deleted by its author Daniel537 Jun 2013 #8

feel free to explain to us just how truly evil he was frylock Jun 2013 #10

Okay, but rather than listing who he was and what he did... Demo_Chris Jun 2013 #12

I don't know what it would take LWolf Jun 2013 #9

Would the Iraqis have been better off if Iraq was never created? JoePhilly Jun 2013 #11

Of course. Smarmie Doofus Jun 2013 #13

Guess it depends on who you ask Lurks Often Jun 2013 #14

It would depend on what Iraqi you speak of sarisataka Jun 2013 #15

I know we'd be better off. nt rrneck Jun 2013 #16

The fact that the USA would certainly be better off is my only concern Tom Ripley Jun 2013 #17