General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Gun interests WANT criminals to have guns [View all]beevul
(12,194 posts)I'm not even going to address the tripe you surrounded and seasoned this bunch of non-reality with.
"Your objective standards are meant to extend guns into cities, where they are put to the most lethal use. So pretend you have nothing to do with reality."
Ahh, the "I'm saying that without saying that" game. There used to be a poster from the great white north that played that game, and played it well she did. Until she was tombstoned for "making DU suck".
What are you "saying without saying"? Oh that's easy. That concealed carry holders contribute to gun violence in a statistically meaningfull way.
Sorry, hate to burst your bubble, but it just isn't so.
So what we have here is you, lecturing me about reality, after the clear implication that a group which is statisticly more law abiding than law enforcement- conceal carry holders - has some significant effect on gun violence.
"The best possible spin is that you simply don't care about the repercussions."
No, the best possible spin, is that there even ARE repercussions in any statistically meaningful measure.
"So pretend you have nothing to do with reality. You obviously make a habit of it."
Physician, heal thy self.