Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
4. that's an awful piece.
Tue Jun 18, 2013, 06:32 AM
Jun 2013

and I am absolutely opposed to intervention in Syria

First of all, the comparison is utterly spurious. Fuck, of course the colonies were able to set up infrastructure. We were thousands of miles across an ocean from our colonizer, in an era when traversing the ocean took weeks.

Chile? Brazil? Almost as spurious. the religious divide which is such an enormous component in Syria, played virtually no part in those countries.

Oh, and lest Hartmann forgot: There was indeed foreign intervention/aid in the U.S. Revolution. Has he never heard of General Lafayette?

In the American Revolutionary War (1775–1783), France fought alongside the United States, against Britain, from 1778. French money, munitions, soldiers and naval forces proved essential to America's victory over the Crown, but France gained little except large debts.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/France_in_the_American_Revolutionary_War

About the only thing Hartmann gets right here is that U.S. intervention is a really, really bad idea.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Syria: If People Don't Do...»Reply #4