General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Democrats Risk Losing a Generation to Cynical Libertarianism [View all]allin99
(894 posts)they came out. (i actually agree with you on every part except for "infiltrators). the people chose in 08. I know they didn't realize who he was, but you can see that the base of the party is now backing extended surveillance. (64% of dems now say it's okay). That means it's the people creating this new dem to the right party b/c all the sudden base dems are backing this. So it's still the voters chose these people. Maybe unbeknowest to them but we see over and over again "i'm not happy but i'll vote for them anyway", we're all caught in this dilemma. Who the heck can i vote for, a D or an R, so the D's vote D no matter what the D party does. So i am in agreement with you, why did obama appoint republicans. He never intended not to, people read whatever they wanted to into the campaign, even when he clearly said i'll put republicans in my cabinent, said he wanted to go to war with pakistan, etc. So they're not infiltrators, we the D's put them in by putting someone in who put them in. Even though people didn't know they were doing it. So yes, in 2010 young people said, oh wait, i didn't sign up for this, but if obama is actively upping involvement in syria, extending surveillance, then it's not like the people by his side are sneaking in there. He's putting them their and following bush's policies all on his own.
So i am actually in full agreement with you.