Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Journalistic impartiality tested in NSA leak story [View all]Whisp
(24,096 posts)11. No, they are not well respected just on your say so (Greenwald.Clemons).
What they do is not objective, it appears personal to Greenwald as his dislike of Obama has shown over the years and it is not investigative but is agenda driven.
We can't believe anyone who happens to have a keyboard, and agenda and some gullible people that Want lies to be truths. Main stream media is corrupt enough, now we have typists making headlines.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You have provided a perfect example of what the article is saying. Both Clemons and Greenwald
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#7
I don't have anyone on ignore, I love debate, even more with those who 'can't get anything left'.
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#14
Not to mention Greenwald character assassinates anyone who disagrees with him.
JaneyVee
Jun 2013
#31
Most of those you mentioned are either dead or they are not who the general public get their
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#39
Dragging up an old legal case again? I haven't clicked, but is that the one where the judge
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#12
"The magistrate judge granted both motions, finding defense counsel's conduct unethical under two"
msanthrope
Jun 2013
#32
Funny that the judge ruled that his actions were not unethical but you claim that he was...
Luminous Animal
Jun 2013
#17
Thank you again. Disgusting attempt to smear a man because of a political disagreement.
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#23
"The magistrate judge granted both motions, finding defense counsel's conduct unethical under two"
msanthrope
Jun 2013
#33
You can weasel your way all around it but the judge's words are clear. As for your "A 52-page
Luminous Animal
Jun 2013
#34
Mr. Greenwald and I are also quoting the ruling. And I asked for a link to the originial case the
Luminous Animal
Jun 2013
#42
I gave you the cite. Kindly read what you are opining on. Heck...I even gave you an online
msanthrope
Jun 2013
#45
I've given you the citation. I also gave you an online resource. Why haven't you read the case
msanthrope
Jun 2013
#46
I have read the contents of your link. It has nothing about a 52-page transcript...
Luminous Animal
Jun 2013
#47
You provide a cititation but can provide no link to assess the veracity. Nice racket
Luminous Animal
Jun 2013
#49
Let me see if I have this correctly...you are unable to access the cases you opine on?
msanthrope
Jun 2013
#50
You gave me the link to the appeal. Can you or can you not give me a link to the original case.
Luminous Animal
Jun 2013
#51
If you have the cite, look it up! Don't know how to do that? Then perhaps you
msanthrope
Jun 2013
#52
Congratulations on parroting a Little Green Footballs comment TO THE LETTER.
Luminous Animal
Jun 2013
#53
Look at the dates--LGF and Crooks and Liars copied me. LGF links to my OP on DU.
msanthrope
Jun 2013
#54
News is what somebody somewhere wants to suppress; all the rest is advertising. Lord Northcliffe
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jun 2013
#41