General Discussion

bike man

(620 posts)

52. Truman sent money and advisors in 1950

Tue Jun 18, 2013, 07:21 PM

Jun 2013

July 26, 1950 - United States military involvement in Vietnam begins as President Harry Truman authorizes $15 million in military aid to the French.

American military advisors will accompany the flow of U.S. tanks, planes, artillery and other supplies to Vietnam. Over the next four years, the U.S. will spend $3 Billion on the French war and by 1954 will provide 80 percent of all war supplies used by the French.

http://www.historyplace.com/unitedstates/vietnam/index-1945.html

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

70 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why do we have 5 branches of the military? [View all] Yavin4 Jun 2013 OP

'Cause we need more top brass and bigger budgets than two branches would allow. Naturally! truebluegreen Jun 2013 #1

well, 3 of them make good sense quinnox Jun 2013 #2

marines are technically the navy arely staircase Jun 2013 #16

My favorite poster: The Marines are looking for a few good men. The Navy has them. Siwsan Jun 2013 #43

The Air Force wasn't a separate branch until 1947 frazzled Jun 2013 #34

Yep. and Air Force was spun off into their own branch, Volaris Jun 2013 #61

Ask Tevye... pinboy3niner Jun 2013 #3

so each is limited in its power so there are no military coup'd'etats by one rogue head graham4anything Jun 2013 #4

You mean someone like George Washington should never be president? former9thward Jun 2013 #37

Eisenhower should never have been President. Most everyone I know agrees Adlai should have. graham4anything Jun 2013 #38

We had no war when Eisenhower was president. former9thward Jun 2013 #39

Not quite correct............. mrmpa Jun 2013 #48

No quite correct. former9thward Jun 2013 #51

Truman sent money and advisors in 1950 bike man Jun 2013 #52

George Washington said no military general should be president nt markiv Jun 2013 #64

Coast guard is department of transportation, not DoD. nt stevenleser Jun 2013 #5

Why can't the Navy do the Coast Guard's job? n/t Yavin4 Jun 2013 #8

Because the Navy's a purely military force TransitJohn Jun 2013 #9

Because most of the Coast Guard's role is civilian. nt DevonRex Jun 2013 #10

though they did sink a dozen or so u-boats during the big one. arely staircase Jun 2013 #23

Yes they did. If our land borders were DevonRex Jun 2013 #28

That would mean militarization of the Coast Guard's duties, much of which is search and rescue. nt stevenleser Jun 2013 #11

The Coast Guard has law enforcement powers sarisataka Jun 2013 #65

Not for awhile Cirque du So-What Jun 2013 #35

Coast Guard is now in Homeland Security Hangingon Jun 2013 #36

Yes, but I was surprised to find this... pinboy3niner Jun 2013 #41

Coast Guard went into the Navy during WWII Hangingon Jun 2013 #45

Yep, I stand corrected. I was remembering from my own active duty days in the USAF. nt stevenleser Jun 2013 #57

the Air Force is kind of important giftedgirl77 Jun 2013 #6

Technically the Marine Corp is part of the navy. NutmegYankee Jun 2013 #7

But don't tell a Marine that unless you're looking for a fight (nt) Jeff In Milwaukee Jun 2013 #14

true, but they cash those dept. of the navy checks arely staircase Jun 2013 #18

Marine - My Ass Rides in Navy Equipment NutmegYankee Jun 2013 #24

Army- Ain't ready for the Marines yet. oneshooter Jun 2013 #40

Nonsense. All Marines know that they are under the Dept of the Navy. AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2013 #29

And we do realse that the Navy is a wonderfull transport and supply unit. oneshooter Jun 2013 #47

If you were in an air wing and miss sea duty, here's some helpful tips borrowed from an old salt: AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2013 #62

I'm sending this to an old friend who was a Navy pilot Jeff In Milwaukee Jun 2013 #66

No sea duty, just a simple Mud Marine E5. oneshooter Jun 2013 #70

The number of major branches isn't the problem. The military is tremendously complex... Scuba Jun 2013 #12

How about this. We keep all five branches and fire all the contractors (nt) Jeff In Milwaukee Jun 2013 #15

That'd be a great start! Scuba Jun 2013 #17

+ 25 million...use part of the massive savings to give the recruits a nice raise nt msongs Jun 2013 #20

Speaking on behalf of every non-com Jeff In Milwaukee Jun 2013 #21

Revenue Service go where? One_Life_To_Give Jun 2013 #13

Most informative post. Control-Z Jun 2013 #27

The Air Force is completely superfluous. It's all about turf wars and graft. Egalitarian Thug Jun 2013 #19

Because the military brass always need polishing n/t SoCalDem Jun 2013 #22

We had those two before the end of WW-II. Now we actually have only one. ieoeja Jun 2013 #25

The Marines were founded on Nov, 10 1775. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #33

Screw McNamara!! n/t oneshooter Jun 2013 #42

'cause we don't have a 6th one yet, just give it time Motown_Johnny Jun 2013 #26

Actually, the 6th one is the CIA n/t Yavin4 Jun 2013 #59

If we do get a space force Inkfreak Jun 2013 #69

What would be the advantage of reducing the number of branches? Recursion Jun 2013 #30

Streamlined service would mean less money Yavin4 Jun 2013 #60

would it streamline things? Recursion Jun 2013 #63

They have their own planes because they do different jobs jeff47 Jun 2013 #68

NO advantage. Big disadvantage-one rogue branch overthrow the President. graham4anything Jun 2013 #67

The army occupies, the marines take beach heads Rex Jun 2013 #31

For a solution let's ask an expert. Egalitarian Thug Jun 2013 #32

What would combining branches of the military get us? Orsino Jun 2013 #44

"Besides, we old soldiers like having four other branches to be better than." pinboy3niner Jun 2013 #46

Not to worry. We have oodles of money to spend on our bloated military. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2013 #49

DoD has an obsession with the number '5'? pinboy3niner Jun 2013 #50

That way they can alocate more money and no one says a thing darkangel218 Jun 2013 #53

I have read that our Navy has the second largest Air Force in the world, ours being first. 1-Old-Man Jun 2013 #54

Because the Army doesn't like to get its feet wet. oneshooter Jun 2013 #58

So we can buy more from the military industrial complex. liberal N proud Jun 2013 #55

It is my understanding that the actual mission of each branch is quite different. SheilaT Jun 2013 #56