Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: My Son Needs Some Help. Anti-Evolution Speaker Coming to His School [View all]csziggy
(34,189 posts)15. From Scientific American - lots of resources
They had an entire issue on this "debate" in July 2002. You can buy a digital copy but you could also see if your local library has access for free.
Other Resources for Defending Evolution
By John Rennie | June 17, 2002
How to Debate a Creationist: 25 Creationists' Arguments and 25 Evolutionists' Answers. Michael Shermer. Skeptics Society, 1997. This well-researched refutation of creationist claims deals in more depth with many of the same scientific arguments raised here, as well as other philosophical problems. Skeptic magazine routinely covers creation/evolution debates and is a solid, thoughtful source on the subject: www.skeptic.com
Defending Evolution in the Classroom: A Guide to the Creation/Evolution Controversy. Brian J. Alters and Sandra M. Alters. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2001. This up-to-date overview of the creation/evolution controversy explores the issues clearly and readably, with a full appreciation of the cultural and religious influences that create resistance to teaching evolution. It, too, uses a question-and-answer format that should be particularly valuable for teachers.
Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences. Second edition. National Academy Press, 1999. This concise booklet has the backing of the country's top scientific authorities. Although its goal of making a clear, brief statement necessarily limits the detail with which it can pursue its arguments, the publication serves as handy proof that the scientific establishment unwaveringly supports evolution. It is also available at www7.nationalacademies.org/evolution/
The Triumph of Evolution and the Failure of Creationism. Niles Eldredge. W. H. Freeman and Company, 2000. The author, a leading contributor to evolution theory and a curator at the American Museum of Natural History in New York City, offers a scathing critique of evolution's opponents.
More: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=other-resources-for-defen
By John Rennie | June 17, 2002
How to Debate a Creationist: 25 Creationists' Arguments and 25 Evolutionists' Answers. Michael Shermer. Skeptics Society, 1997. This well-researched refutation of creationist claims deals in more depth with many of the same scientific arguments raised here, as well as other philosophical problems. Skeptic magazine routinely covers creation/evolution debates and is a solid, thoughtful source on the subject: www.skeptic.com
Defending Evolution in the Classroom: A Guide to the Creation/Evolution Controversy. Brian J. Alters and Sandra M. Alters. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2001. This up-to-date overview of the creation/evolution controversy explores the issues clearly and readably, with a full appreciation of the cultural and religious influences that create resistance to teaching evolution. It, too, uses a question-and-answer format that should be particularly valuable for teachers.
Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences. Second edition. National Academy Press, 1999. This concise booklet has the backing of the country's top scientific authorities. Although its goal of making a clear, brief statement necessarily limits the detail with which it can pursue its arguments, the publication serves as handy proof that the scientific establishment unwaveringly supports evolution. It is also available at www7.nationalacademies.org/evolution/
The Triumph of Evolution and the Failure of Creationism. Niles Eldredge. W. H. Freeman and Company, 2000. The author, a leading contributor to evolution theory and a curator at the American Museum of Natural History in New York City, offers a scathing critique of evolution's opponents.
More: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=other-resources-for-defen
Linked from this article which is available in full if you're a subscriber:
15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense [Preview]
Opponents of evolution want to make a place for creationism by tearing down real science, but their arguments don't hold up
By John Rennie | June 18, 2002 | 2574
Creationism Vs. Evolution The controversy over evolution rages on. Win all your debates against creationists with the science in our special report. » September 10, 2008
When Charles Darwin introduced the theory of evolution through natural selection 143 years ago, the scientists of the day argued over it fiercely, but the massing evidence from paleontology, genetics, zoology, molecular biology and other fields gradually established evolution's truth beyond reasonable doubt. Today that battle has been won everywhere--except in the public imagination.
Embarrassingly, in the 21st century, in the most scientifically advanced nation the world has ever known, creationists can still persuade politicians, judges and ordinary citizens that evolution is a flawed, poorly supported fantasy. They lobby for creationist ideas such as "intelligent design" to be taught as alternatives to evolution in science classrooms. As this article goes to press, the Ohio Board of Education is debating whether to mandate such a change. Some antievolutionists, such as Philip E. Johnson, a law professor at the University of California at Berkeley and author of Darwin on Trial, admit that they intend for intelligent-design theory to serve as a "wedge" for reopening science classrooms to discussions of God.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=15-answers-to-creationist
Opponents of evolution want to make a place for creationism by tearing down real science, but their arguments don't hold up
By John Rennie | June 18, 2002 | 2574
Creationism Vs. Evolution The controversy over evolution rages on. Win all your debates against creationists with the science in our special report. » September 10, 2008
When Charles Darwin introduced the theory of evolution through natural selection 143 years ago, the scientists of the day argued over it fiercely, but the massing evidence from paleontology, genetics, zoology, molecular biology and other fields gradually established evolution's truth beyond reasonable doubt. Today that battle has been won everywhere--except in the public imagination.
Embarrassingly, in the 21st century, in the most scientifically advanced nation the world has ever known, creationists can still persuade politicians, judges and ordinary citizens that evolution is a flawed, poorly supported fantasy. They lobby for creationist ideas such as "intelligent design" to be taught as alternatives to evolution in science classrooms. As this article goes to press, the Ohio Board of Education is debating whether to mandate such a change. Some antievolutionists, such as Philip E. Johnson, a law professor at the University of California at Berkeley and author of Darwin on Trial, admit that they intend for intelligent-design theory to serve as a "wedge" for reopening science classrooms to discussions of God.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=15-answers-to-creationist
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Seems like an excellent chance for your son to find the information on his own...
JSnuffy
Feb 2012
#2
Have him ask the guy how it is that bacteria becomes resistant to antibiotics n/t
dflprincess
Feb 2012
#6
Tell him to ask Mr Nutting why humans have flying buttresses above their eye teeth.
yellowcanine
Feb 2012
#8
Bill Hicks: "Ever notice how the people who believe in creationism look really unevolved?"
Initech
Feb 2012
#17
I would ask Nutting how to expain how all the breeds of dog came about from the first wolves
libinnyandia
Feb 2012
#18
"Have you ever seen a snail trying to run away from the wrath of a loving God?"
me b zola
Feb 2012
#41
np ... I've been daring the local schools to try and teach this nonsense here in NC.
JoePhilly
Feb 2012
#29
Calling it the "Theory of Creationism" only reinforces the notion that . . .
markpkessinger
Feb 2012
#80
I don't understand why he has to have ammunition to counteract the speaker.
Drahthaardogs
Feb 2012
#27
His son will learn more, by 1st listening, and then asking meaningful questions.
JoePhilly
Feb 2012
#30
LOL...I am saddened that someone who calls themselves a scientist and advocates
renie408
Feb 2012
#61
Many people believe the world is 6000 years old. That doesn't mean you have to cater to them.
renie408
Feb 2012
#31
The school should let kids opt out that day-a notice should be sent to the parents...
jenmito
Feb 2012
#54
Squidbillies: "Them fossils was a jesusly ruse to keep nonbelievers off the scent."
AtomicKitten
Feb 2012
#56
Your son's a university student. He can do his own research. It'll be good for him.
LeftyMom
Feb 2012
#57
Yes. I do all his homework for him. He is actually incapable of thinking for himself.
renie408
Feb 2012
#62