Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 'Low T': Don't fall for the hype (From Consumer Reports about low testosterone and the drugs) [View all]onethatcares
(16,970 posts)91. to all that replied to me
I'm sorry that you think I would be lying about this. I laid out what happened in my case as plainly as I could. I had blood work done, everything was fine and then my doc said, "but your testosterone is low". He then gave me a slick advertising brochure and a prescription, I took said prescription to my pharmacy, (CVS), later the pharmacist called me and told me that my insurance plan would not cover it, upon asking how much it cost, I was told $400.00. WOW. whoda thunk???
Next day I call my doctor asking if a generic or lower priced alternative was available for my condition. I did not and still have not gotten a reply.
Now, why would I want to lie about something like that?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
'Low T': Don't fall for the hype (From Consumer Reports about low testosterone and the drugs) [View all]
Playinghardball
Jun 2013
OP
So let's review. Testosterone: high risks, low discernable benefit,covered by insurance. Birth
Squinch
Jun 2013
#2
Yep, they were cheap then. Their cost has gone up exponentially, like many other medical costs.
raccoon
Jun 2013
#65
To paraphrase Bill Maher: "first they invented a boner pill for men who wanted to fuck but couldn't"
arcane1
Jun 2013
#53
Yep, that leapt off the page when I saw that. I wonder how many doctors warn of the risks...
reformist2
Jun 2013
#18
So then your bones re-absorb and you die from pneumonia recovering from frequent broken hips,
jtuck004
Jun 2013
#75
Sorry, didn't know he was a quack. I just chose the first link that popped up in Google.
tridim
Jun 2013
#63
Do check labels. I've heard that processors are tossing soy into everything as a filler
Hekate
Jun 2013
#31
Which could be why its use is predominantly among women who have problem with hot flashes
jtuck004
Jun 2013
#71
All this has done great things for people with congential hypogonadism. Higher cost, social idiocy,
jtuck004
Jun 2013
#40
Oogh. People worried about not having enough testosterone generally have too much already. (nt)
Posteritatis
Jun 2013
#25
"Might fuel prostate cancer"? There is no might about it, testosterone WILL fuel prostate cancer,
still_one
Jun 2013
#28
something is wrong there I pay $75.00 for a 3 month bottle of testosterone that I self inject.
LiberalArkie
Jun 2013
#46
There is a proven way for aging men to increase their muscle, HGH, vitality, appearance, performance
eallen
Jun 2013
#39
That along with a healthy diet and vitamins would put half of the medical profession out of a job
nolabels
Jun 2013
#64
It's not just about sex, although I can see why the commercials would give that impression.
winter is coming
Jun 2013
#48
Your husband likely represents the small minority who actually suffer from clear low-testosterone.
Gravitycollapse
Jun 2013
#49
Everytime I hear one of those ads I think we should start calling menopause "Low E"
dflprincess
Jun 2013
#52
A low sperm count in men over 65 isn't necessarily a bad thing. However, the other things concern me
Ian David
Jun 2013
#54
Yes, and I'm sure most doctors at least get an urge to roll their eyes when patients do ask.
Nimajneb Nilknarf
Jun 2013
#89
