Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
2. Truth-one side does not want the democratic party to keep the senate. Truth-Ed Markey for Senate
Wed Jun 19, 2013, 06:05 AM
Jun 2013

falsehood- both sides are the same

Ask the republicantealibertarian party that yesterday voted to pass a new abortion law restricting a constitutional right of privacy even more.

Fact-the BushPaulFamilyinc will NOT get a democratic supported anything they desire when they take America back to 1859 if they get the chance.

FACT-SCOTUS-two justices most likely to retire the soonest are LIBERAL justices
False- Rand Paul would vote for another Ginsberg and Breyer. Ah, no, he would not. Rand Paul would vote for Robert Bork
Samuel ALito, John Roberts, Antonin Scalia and Harriett Miers had he had a chance. (of course Bush only picked Miers knowing she would not be voted on, so he could get Samuel Alito(perhaps the single worst justice on the current court for a democratic supporter)
through. Remember, Bush had to name a woman first as it was O'Connor's seat, so what did he do? He named one so unqualified his own party said no, and Bush won the gamble he set out to do in the first place.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What really is the truth now? [View all] YeahSureRight Jun 2013 OP
Of course you can never KNOW who is telling the truth. randome Jun 2013 #1
You think you know the truth when infact the only truth you know is what tey tell you YeahSureRight Jun 2013 #5
I'm less inclined to believe anything Snowden says. randome Jun 2013 #8
I know WovenGems Jun 2013 #11
What I know is that I used to operate a system that could listen, identify, locate YeahSureRight Jun 2013 #15
Thank you WovenGems Jun 2013 #18
When I left that job 20 years ago they were already starting to work YeahSureRight Jun 2013 #23
Well, we can look at the evidence of course... Pholus Jun 2013 #9
The potential for abuse is always present. randome Jun 2013 #10
The potential for abuse is mitigated if there is a forced disposal of information. Pholus Jun 2013 #13
I don't see storing numbers as 'lifelong surveillance' but yeah, I can see the need for disposal. randome Jun 2013 #17
You're damned by your associates in those "numbers" Pholus Jun 2013 #20
Truth-one side does not want the democratic party to keep the senate. Truth-Ed Markey for Senate graham4anything Jun 2013 #2
Fact: Our nation has codified a privacy ethic known as the fourth amendment. geckosfeet Jun 2013 #3
It really is just a piece of parchment with old faded words written on it now nothing more. YeahSureRight Jun 2013 #6
Then the truth is relative. geckosfeet Jun 2013 #7
Of course it is relative YeahSureRight Jun 2013 #21
Correct on al counts. geckosfeet Jun 2013 #27
Events can not be lied about -- for example if gasoline goes up then we all know KurtNYC Jun 2013 #4
I tend to not trust bought and paid for politicians. The Link Jun 2013 #12
Figure out what the worst is and imagine things are 3.4 times worse than that. el_bryanto Jun 2013 #14
2+2=4 Puzzledtraveller Jun 2013 #16
Truth is like pornography. kentuck Jun 2013 #19
My method for discerning truth - it is the polar opposite of whatever republicans say rurallib Jun 2013 #22
my bet is that the Ron Pauler is lying. n/t Whisp Jun 2013 #24
A sprkly wibbly wobbly thing IN THE MIDDLE of soemthing else. sibelian Jun 2013 #25
You may have hit upon the crux of the matter. Turbineguy Jun 2013 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What really is the truth ...»Reply #2