Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(106,157 posts)
20. Well, it's not about the size of the middle class
Wed Jun 19, 2013, 09:53 AM
Jun 2013

It's about the median wealth. There's nothing in this about how broadly you define the sector in each country.

For what it's worth:

So who counts as middle class?

According to organisations like the United Nations and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), it's someone who earns or spends $10 to $100 per day.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-22956470


So if your household income is above $36,500 per person, you are above middle class, internationally.

The paper which seems to have been taken as the basis for the definition is here: http://www.oecd.org/dev/44457738.pdf

It says (2009 figures):
USA: 230 million middle class
EU: 450 million
rest of North America: 108 million
rest of Europe (which I think includes Russia): 214 million
Japan: 125 million
Whole world: 1845 million

It points out:

The numbers of the global middle class hide the differences in purchasing power. The
range for what constitutes a middle class consumer is quite broad, so someone in the Chinese
middle class does not spend as much as someone in the US middle class. The data bear this out.
The North American middle class accounts for substantially more of global spending than its
population share, while the reverse is true of Asia’s middle class. The US is home to 12 per cent
of the world’s middle class in terms of absolute numbers of people, but it accounts for
USD4.4 trillion (21 per cent) of the USD21 trillion in global spending by middle class consumers.
The difference is because the US middle class is much wealthier than the average global middle
class consumer.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

America loves the rich and doesn't want them to do without... However they don't think that midnight Jun 2013 #1
They want you to pull yourself up by the bootstraps but they don't tell you hobbit709 Jun 2013 #2
Thats a fact hobbit sorefeet Jun 2013 #4
We have our winner. Brigid Jun 2013 #11
They also don't tell you that they own the bootstraps and you'll be paying handsomely to use them. Arkansas Granny Jun 2013 #14
It really wasn't like that in the early, mid-'70s deutsey Jun 2013 #5
I think we have ALEC to thank for this.. midnight Jun 2013 #6
along with the infamous Powell Memo deutsey Jun 2013 #8
"there were plenty of problems the "counter-culture" movements created" --what do you mean? nt raccoon Jun 2013 #23
Drug abuse, for one deutsey Jun 2013 #24
Everybody was legally drinking and Rx drugging leftstreet Jun 2013 #28
Last I checked, heroin was illegal, yeah. deutsey Jun 2013 #32
By the late '70s deutsey Jun 2013 #33
K & R marmar Jun 2013 #3
K&R abelenkpe Jun 2013 #7
27th in the World - Bar none!! byeya Jun 2013 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author mother earth Jun 2013 #10
K&R - Median statistics are way more meaningful than average/mean statistics. reformist2 Jun 2013 #12
The inevitable corruption of capitalism fasttense Jun 2013 #13
We have the most millionaires & billionaires. We also have the most people in prison. baldguy Jun 2013 #15
K&R. HughBeaumont Jun 2013 #16
This is the REAL news in America.. mountain grammy Jun 2013 #17
Is this news?...America, who, during the 1960's, had the largest middle class in the world, whathehell Jun 2013 #18
Well, it's not about the size of the middle class muriel_volestrangler Jun 2013 #20
K & R. nt historylovr Jun 2013 #19
Walmart nineteen50 Jun 2013 #21
And it's going downhill fast TakeALeftTurn Jun 2013 #22
The USA is not a "First World" nation and never has been. hunter Jun 2013 #25
Not too sure about the "never" part truebluegreen Jun 2013 #26
If the USA was "never" a first world nation, no other country ever was either. Quantess Jun 2013 #30
Thom Hartmann once said that if our current average incomes had stayed up with inflation Quixote1818 Jun 2013 #27
We're number on... I mean 27! YEAH! sakabatou Jun 2013 #29
K & R n/t glinda Jun 2013 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Big Lie: America Doesn't ...»Reply #20