Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)
44. Sigh. The FBI investigates acts of terrorism inside the U.S. Like the Boston bombing.
Wed Jun 19, 2013, 04:11 PM
Jun 2013

But sometimes there is overlap. Like in the Boston bombing, where the Russians had warned that Tamerlan had become radicalized, had contact with rebels in Dagestan. The FBI couldn't get a FISA warrant on him though because he was a Green Card Holder and they did not have proof that he was 1) a member of a foreign terrorist organization and 2) planning to carry out a violent terrorist attack. The rebels he met with in Dagestan were his cousins on his mother's side. And Russia refused to provide further proof of their claims. Tamerlan had posted a radical cleric's sermons on You Tube but that's free speech.

Now, after the bombing was carried out, obviously he was a terrorist and so was his brother who survived. Then the possibility of being involved with a foreign terrorist group was much more likely, given the Russian warning, his contact with his cousins, and the death of his Canadian friend in Dagestan at Russian hands. Following so far?

This is pertinent for 2 reasons. One, if a foreign group is involved we have to know. They may not stop at one bombing. Two, there may be others in the U.S. besides the Tamerlan and Dzhokhar. Those are the reasons we have to know.

But it also allows two things. One, it allows a CIA interrogator to join the FBI team who questioned Dzhokhar but solely for questions limited to a possible foreign connection, since that is CIA's jurisdiction. The FBI, of course, was investigating the bombing itself and possible conspirators. Two it allowed, finally, a FISA warrant on the brothers' phone records. In this way the FBI could see if there was a network within the U.S. and the CIA could see if the brothers were connected to a terrorist organization who might have actually directed the bombing.

I cannot think of a better case that explains just HOW safe American citizens are from government intrusion than this one. Warrants couldn't be gotten even with warnings because the evidence didn't meet the high standards set by law until a terrorist act had already been committed.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Where? WovenGems Jun 2013 #1
not sure you are supposed to see them..thats the point. nt galileoreloaded Jun 2013 #4
Blue skies WovenGems Jun 2013 #11
oh for the love of reason. cali Jun 2013 #15
What's WovenGems Jun 2013 #16
I can't speak for others here, but I'm glad to speak for myself cali Jun 2013 #21
critical thinking would mean that one not wet their undergarments about remote control geek tragedy Jun 2013 #18
who's doing that? I'm certainly not. cali Jun 2013 #22
Who said they were used for "domestic spying?" nt geek tragedy Jun 2013 #24
what else would the FBI use them for? Do tell. cali Jun 2013 #27
Do you consider traffic and police helicopters "spying?" geek tragedy Jun 2013 #30
good catch! treestar Jun 2013 #59
Well, remember they 'spied' on Occupy Wall Street by geek tragedy Jun 2013 #60
People who are bringing up the fact that water is wet, government surveys and bears... uponit7771 Jun 2013 #31
Is that better or worse than other forms of surveillance? Buzz Clik Jun 2013 #2
FISC. Melinda Jun 2013 #5
Zero concern about Google Earth and other photographic surveillance... tridim Jun 2013 #20
I fucking hate google earth. cali Jun 2013 #25
You hate Google Earth? Why? Buzz Clik Jun 2013 #29
I have to say, I am somewhat disturbed by the whole Google Earth thing curlyred Jun 2013 #52
The Googlemobile snapped me four times mowing my lawn. My lawn!!! For the love of God! Buzz Clik Jun 2013 #28
Whereas police helicopters are AOK. nt geek tragedy Jun 2013 #3
And RC planes jberryhill Jun 2013 #6
RC planes are drones, no? nt geek tragedy Jun 2013 #10
I'm screwed, I have RC planes with cameras on them. tridim Jun 2013 #35
I believe in open laws and the Bill of Rights, not in casting nets. YMMV, however. Melinda Jun 2013 #7
How are drones offend the Constitution in a way that helicopters don't? nt geek tragedy Jun 2013 #8
Yep, helicopters or even a panel truck parked on the curb. JaneQPublic Jun 2013 #36
Also, surveillance of public areas isn't exactly spying nt geek tragedy Jun 2013 #37
Indeed. (nt) JaneQPublic Jun 2013 #42
At least they aren't killing Americans with drones. The Link Jun 2013 #9
Oh, wait. Melinda Jun 2013 #23
Well not in the USA yet, to the best of our knowledge. avaistheone1 Jun 2013 #64
Looks like drone industry needs to increase campaign $ to DiFi. HooptieWagon Jun 2013 #12
lol, my exact thought after reading the article. Melinda Jun 2013 #26
FBI director says 22 people have access to surveillance database uncovered by Snowden Catherina Jun 2013 #13
You know what I'm a bit confused on? Melinda Jun 2013 #32
They converged after 9-11. The Bush people's main complaint was that they were to separate Catherina Jun 2013 #33
And yes, we need to vote Congress out and vote some decent people in Catherina Jun 2013 #34
Sigh. The FBI investigates acts of terrorism inside the U.S. Like the Boston bombing. DevonRex Jun 2013 #44
My question was rhetorical; I can be sarcastic at times. Melinda Jun 2013 #47
"The FBI couldn't get a FISA warrant on him though because he was a Green Card Holder" Citation? Melinda Jun 2013 #48
They can, but first have to prove membership in foreign terrorist organization or planning DevonRex Jun 2013 #49
Thanks. I'm a patient woman. Now that I know you'll supply it, I can wait at your leisure. Melinda Jun 2013 #51
LOL, I just posted it. DevonRex Jun 2013 #54
Finally. From my favorite law site, Cornell. A Wex article. DevonRex Jun 2013 #53
And waded through 50 USC... The pertinent parts DevonRex Jun 2013 #56
Now the definitions in FISA... DevonRex Jun 2013 #57
Thank you Devon treestar Jun 2013 #61
I have been trying to point it out. I just don't start OPs. DevonRex Jun 2013 #63
When did DU officially become Alex Jones' conspiracy hour? tridim Jun 2013 #14
It's been that way on and off again since 2001. geek tragedy Jun 2013 #17
This is my favorite Floyd_Gondolli Jun 2013 #38
Well, webcams are hijacked by hackers all the time. geek tragedy Jun 2013 #39
We are doomed, I tell ya! treestar Jun 2013 #62
I remember the Police Chief of Boston mentioned the possible use of drones for surveillance BenzoDia Jun 2013 #19
But, they're good drones, Melinda. Octafish Jun 2013 #40
Maybe not friendly but certainly useful... JaneQPublic Jun 2013 #46
Well then, that changes everything, doesn't it? Can I expect my pony soon? Melinda Jun 2013 #50
My Little Droney Octafish Jun 2013 #55
How would you like to be informed about this? randome Jun 2013 #41
uninformed citizens can't consent, and we are not a democracy for that reason. HiPointDem Jun 2013 #43
kr HiPointDem Jun 2013 #45
What are they looking for? treestar Jun 2013 #58
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Government Is Spying ...»Reply #44