Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
45. 'warrants' handed out by secret courts, just like the stasi. on information already on file. big
Wed Jun 19, 2013, 06:11 PM
Jun 2013

fucking deal.

and since one 'warrant' covers millions of people, nothing specific about such 'warrants' either. just fishing, just 'we want the data so we'll do a proforma request in our secret court of one connected judge'.

not to mention that under bush they didn't even need a warrant and they've been moving back to that position.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Not only are they listening and reading, they're storing all that somewhere. randome Jun 2013 #1
your welcome warrior1 Jun 2013 #3
They will be storing it here soon Go Vols Jun 2013 #8
So, tell me how the NSA manages to listen, read all this information, with a measly $20 million? FSogol Jun 2013 #2
Workers get paid in popcorn. HappyMe Jun 2013 #4
I should go work for the NSA, I listen to people's phone calls when in the grocery store. FSogol Jun 2013 #6
In the store, in the bar, HappyMe Jun 2013 #7
DUZY!!!!!!!!!!! dixiegrrrrl Jun 2013 #16
It's one hell of an If statement. In VBA. randome Jun 2013 #9
LOL Lucinda Jun 2013 #71
they don't. but they are able to sift it according to key words, targeted individuals & their HiPointDem Jun 2013 #13
Evidence they have done that without a warrant since the Bush administration? FSogol Jun 2013 #14
1 'warrant' = millions of 'sifts'. no different from the stasi tracking the movements and actions HiPointDem Jun 2013 #17
Hyperbole! It's not just for breakfast anymore! FSogol Jun 2013 #24
why don't you just tell me the difference between the stasi maintaining files on most of the HiPointDem Jun 2013 #25
Data versue Metadata. It is like worrying because the Stasti had a phone book. n/t FSogol Jun 2013 #28
Cause who you talk to tells nothing about who you are... Pholus Jun 2013 #31
nothing to do with phone books. it's like the stasi having a record of everyone you contacted, HiPointDem Jun 2013 #33
if they get a warrant. FSogol Jun 2013 #35
'warrants' handed out by secret courts, just like the stasi. on information already on file. big HiPointDem Jun 2013 #45
the FISC warrant only giftedgirl77 Jun 2013 #51
fisa clearly outlines that domestic data can be surveilled if connected to 'terrorists'. which is HiPointDem Jun 2013 #54
Source the 20 million number, please. Pholus Jun 2013 #30
LOL--he quoted $20 million but it went overbudget to $2 billion marions ghost Jun 2013 #34
I never said the building cost $20MM. That's the cost of the Prism program from FSogol Jun 2013 #36
For the data storage, 20 million seems reasonable. Pholus Jun 2013 #40
I'm not sure answers.com is a reliable source for 2 billion phone calls a day Jarla Jun 2013 #5
+1 its sourced to "ihazcheez" thats a credible source! n/t FreeState Jun 2013 #10
That number is actually low... snooper2 Jun 2013 #20
That's very possible Jarla Jun 2013 #22
In the 1960's and 1970's, the US Navy was doing that and more. Savannahmann Jun 2013 #11
I think it's impossible to listen to every piece of data that's out there warrior1 Jun 2013 #12
For a human, yes. Savannahmann Jun 2013 #15
They don't have to listen to it if they store it in a searchable database! Th1onein Jun 2013 #60
Millions of texts are being pored over by NSA analysts, as we speak. MineralMan Jun 2013 #18
Man that would be tedious. If only there were some kind of machine that could help... nt Pholus Jun 2013 #27
It is not that simple. MineralMan Jun 2013 #55
They don't listen to or read all that information, DiamondDog Jun 2013 #19
They don't listen to it, they do save it, for future reference. reformist2 Jun 2013 #21
Yottabytes in Utah marions ghost Jun 2013 #23
The first sentence is such unbelievable nonsense. FSogol Jun 2013 #26
A million exabytes = one yottabyte marions ghost Jun 2013 #43
So your contention is that they are actually storing basketballs in Utah? Pholus Jun 2013 #44
Yeah they've an indoor court in there for the Utah Jazz marions ghost Jun 2013 #47
Actually that whole analogy was strange... Pholus Jun 2013 #48
1 yottabyte = 500 Jacuzzis marions ghost Jun 2013 #59
No, to compare the storage size of a data center building to the physical size of a flashdrive is FSogol Jun 2013 #61
Really. Volume scaling arguments are past you? Not me. Pholus Jun 2013 #62
Do you have reading comprehension issue or just wanna rip someone who disagrees with you? FSogol Jun 2013 #63
Yes, that does seem to pass for reasoning in your world. Pholus Jun 2013 #64
LOL. That's what you got out of what I wrote? FSogol Jun 2013 #65
That's what you wrote. Pholus Jun 2013 #66
See my discussion on this. Pholus Jun 2013 #29
Informative post marions ghost Jun 2013 #32
Actually I completely overestimated Prism's size in that... Pholus Jun 2013 #41
What does the Cyber Command encompass--is that the 20 billion? marions ghost Jun 2013 #46
No the budget is classified, but the total intelligence budget is 80 billion Pholus Jun 2013 #49
OK thanks, obviously I didnt know how marions ghost Jun 2013 #58
Don't you realize what you've done? Savannahmann Jun 2013 #38
That Snowden was a bad neighbor? nt Pholus Jun 2013 #42
my brain hurts giftedgirl77 Jun 2013 #37
Because it says on paper that they should not Savannahmann Jun 2013 #39
I'm not saying there isn't giftedgirl77 Jun 2013 #50
Admisable in court Savannahmann Jun 2013 #52
Shit, I will never argue giftedgirl77 Jun 2013 #53
It sounds to me like the intelligence agencies have interpreted the laws Jarla Jun 2013 #56
Why, because that is what someone is telling you based on what some guy told him? giftedgirl77 Jun 2013 #57
You're right Jarla Jun 2013 #67
Not really, that is what is so funny about the entire situation giftedgirl77 Jun 2013 #68
But the INTERPRETATION of those laws is subject to debate Jarla Jun 2013 #69
Ugh it's painful giftedgirl77 Jun 2013 #70
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Statistics on phone calls...»Reply #45