Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
93. That is not the quote I am talking about.
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 06:19 AM
Feb 2012

From 'Audacity of Hope':

“I agree with George W. Bush when in his second inaugural address he proclaimed a universal desire to be free,” Obama wrote. “But there are few examples in history in which the freedom men and women crave is delivered through outside intervention.”

And I am not going to go searching for it now, but he expanded on that in a question and answer session after a speech he gave in 2007 when asked if he supported Humanitarian Intervention by using the miliatary. His answer was no, that he did not. However when asked again later in the campaign, maybe even that year, he had changed his mind. That change was attributed to his association with Samantha Powers:

It's true Obama doesn't have a long record of foreign policy stances. "He's not fully formed," argues the conservative military historian (and Obama supporter) Andrew Bacevich. "The paper trail is thin," says Ted Galen Carpenter, vice president for defense and foreign policy studies at the libertarian Cato Institute. Nonetheless, the candidate's views are not hard to discern. He believes the United States makes itself safer by promoting "dignity" in other nations through diplomacy and foreign aid. He also believes crumbling societies and failed regimes such as Robert Mugabe's Zimbabwe must be confronted by the international community, including the United States, before they ignite and become threats. And while he sees Iraq as a "dumb war," he's game for smart warfare in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Obama's views started to crystallize when he came to Washington. The new senator fished around for foreign policy talent and scheduled a brief dinner with Samantha Power, a professor at Harvard's Carr Center for Human Rights Policy and the author of the 2002 book "A Problem from Hell": America and the Age of Genocide. The dinner went on for hours. Soon Power was taking a weekly shuttle from Boston to Washington to tutor Obama on foreign policy.

Power believes the United States creates long-term problems when it fails to intervene in failing states or to protect threatened populations. "Security for Americans at home and abroad is contingent on international stability," she writes in "A Problem from Hell", "and there is perhaps no greater source of havoc than a group of well-armed extremists bent on wiping out a people on ethnic, national, or religious grounds." That is what Obama now believes.


http://reason.com/archives/2008/09/19/obamas-wars

So he supported Humanitarian Intervention 'through diplomacy and foreign aid'. But once he hired foreign policy advisers, he began to change. Although even then, his statements were vague when he spoke about intervention

And I'm not the only one who noticed the changes in his stances on foreign intervention. Steve Clemons also was disappointed and clearly remembered as I do, his original position of intervention by diplomacy and foreign aid rather than military intervention:

Steve Clemons, director of the American Strategy Program at the center-left New American Foundation, has watched with mounting disappointment as Obama clarifies his stance on foreign interventions. "He's not the Obama we thought he was," Clemons says.

Clemons, not alone among liberal foreign policy analysts, believes Obama listens to two groups of experts: liberal interventionists and "progressive realists." The latter group, rattled by the Iraq war, agrees with one of Obama's most traditional homilies from his memoir The Audacity of Hope: "There are few examples in history in which the freedom men and women crave is delivered through outside intervention."


But his position on this has always been arbitrary. Earlier, he seems, although it's never clear, to support intervention, but doesn't really clarify what kind. After his association with Power however, he was much more inclined to at least infer, that he would use military intervention. As I said, he changes, changed his mind several times on the issue.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

To some of us it was obvious that we were not backing "good guys". Bonobo Feb 2012 #1
It fixed everything we wanted fixed, the existing tax structure for oil exlporation and production. Arctic Dave Feb 2012 #3
You mean the tax structure that robbed all oil revenue from the Libyan people? TheWraith Feb 2012 #4
Do we really have to go through this again? Did you not learn your lesson last time? Arctic Dave Feb 2012 #75
Really, can you provide some specific details? tabatha Feb 2012 #9
I would have thought you would have learned your lesson last time we went around on this. Arctic Dave Feb 2012 #77
Really? You are dismissing a whole nation because of the acts of a few. tabatha Feb 2012 #5
I didn't dismiss a whole nation. I will tell you specifically who I dismissed. Bonobo Feb 2012 #8
I supported the intervention because of humanitarian reasons. tabatha Feb 2012 #12
First, the Jewish thing. Bonobo Feb 2012 #32
Most of the black people in Libya were there to wor the oil fields Nevernose Feb 2012 #38
My mistake. Thanks for the correction. nt Bonobo Feb 2012 #40
Crickets on the jewish thing? I gave you the answer you requested. Bonobo Feb 2012 #47
Most of the Arab World is antisemitic. ellisonz Feb 2012 #99
This message was self-deleted by its author polly7 Feb 2012 #101
Thank you, Bonobo. Once I saw how brutal and racist the sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #15
Boy, you would have had a hard time living in South Africa after 1994. tabatha Feb 2012 #25
Yes, another African Nation destroyed by Colonialism. sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #31
Gaddafi came to power thanks to the CIA. joshcryer Feb 2012 #35
Where the EFF did I say something about colonialism. tabatha Feb 2012 #41
I gave up responding to you as you always devolve into personal attacks. sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #55
Obama has always been pro-intervention, he was against unilaterally using power... joshcryer Feb 2012 #67
And that was a contradiction of what he said in 2007. sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #85
No, he did not. That is simply false, total revisionism. joshcryer Feb 2012 #88
That is not the quote I am talking about. sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #93
And yet, that position does not suggest that he "opposed it" as you falsely claimed. joshcryer Feb 2012 #94
I'm going to end this conversation because it is the second time you have reverted to sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #95
Her intentions are good? Don't kid yourself. Having observed pattern of her posting here - Fool Count Feb 2012 #102
I disagree. What is needed is perspective. joshcryer Feb 2012 #28
42 years of violence by the state tiny elvis Feb 2012 #50
Good advice, stop allowing the propaganda we receive here to influence sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #57
Huh? joshcryer Feb 2012 #68
Please see post #6 tabatha Feb 2012 #7
Broad brush, much? joshcryer Feb 2012 #19
It is mind boggling. tabatha Feb 2012 #26
When China comes in and arms the OWS movement Bonobo Feb 2012 #33
So, actions of a few can be applied to a whole group if there's a mass insurgency or violent unrest. joshcryer Feb 2012 #36
My chief criticism is against those who support US military intervention in other countries. Bonobo Feb 2012 #46
It was going to be bad either way. joshcryer Feb 2012 #52
No, it wasn't going to be bad. That is what you are meant to believe. sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #86
Patently dishonest. joshcryer Feb 2012 #87
Another personal attack from you. sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #96
Well said...nt SidDithers Feb 2012 #43
We will never learn, will we? chrisa Feb 2012 #22
Did you know that there are some ex-freedom fighters who are protecting the Tawerga in Libya? tabatha Feb 2012 #2
Yes, there is no unified force. David__77 Feb 2012 #14
Freedom fighters, my @ss. EFerrari Feb 2012 #18
Wise, my ass. tabatha Feb 2012 #27
You're still defending these people, not only after their abuses have become plain EFerrari Feb 2012 #39
If you read what I said tabatha Feb 2012 #44
Do you give South African whites the pass on apartheid as you did Germans vis a vis Nazism? nt Bonobo Feb 2012 #48
Nope. Because I personally fought against it. tabatha Feb 2012 #56
Got it. Germans = not responsible. South Africans = responsible. Bonobo Feb 2012 #59
Nope you have got it wrong. tabatha Feb 2012 #63
BTW, I was arrested demonstrating for divestment from the Apartheid govt. of S. Africa. nt Bonobo Feb 2012 #66
And in response to this OP, you post an incredibly idiotic propaganda piece EFerrari Feb 2012 #49
20k were murdered during apartheid, 175k were murdered after. joshcryer Feb 2012 #21
Yes, it is funny how some people here are unwittingly mimicking the pro-apartheid people. tabatha Feb 2012 #30
They're indistinguishable from the pro-apartheid people. joshcryer Feb 2012 #53
OMG. You have not only jumped the shark. Bonobo Feb 2012 #58
Militias from Benghazi and Zintan are trying to protect a refugee camp of 1,500 people tabatha Feb 2012 #6
Actually more judging of American people for the actions of their government would be a good thing. Bonobo Feb 2012 #10
Yes, if the truth is known. tabatha Feb 2012 #23
"I do not blame Germans who had no part in the decisions made by Hitler. " Bonobo Feb 2012 #37
You really stretech the meaning of what I say. tabatha Feb 2012 #60
I did not assign anything to you. Bonobo Feb 2012 #62
Still waiting for your reply to the anti-semitic issue re the Libyan rebels. n Bonobo Feb 2012 #65
It is simply not worth the effort. tabatha Feb 2012 #70
I am referring to the anti-semitism of the Libyan rebels. Bonobo Feb 2012 #71
I've seen this before. joshcryer Feb 2012 #74
I think you need sleep. Bonobo Feb 2012 #78
Yes, I looked up that quote, you conveniently left out the whole quote. joshcryer Feb 2012 #80
The rest of the quote did nothing to change the meaning. Bonobo Feb 2012 #83
The book in question, if I am not wrong, does not absolve the German people either. sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #97
"Judge the individual": did that apply to the pro-Gaddafi forces? David__77 Feb 2012 #16
Yes, any pro-Gaddafi force that took part in atrocities of their own free will are guilty. tabatha Feb 2012 #24
And those that did not, are not guilty. David__77 Feb 2012 #29
Correction to the OP. They didn't "turn" into anything. They always were. nanabugg Feb 2012 #11
Wow, what a judge you are. tabatha Feb 2012 #20
Well, we did probably pay them to sit back and whack Ghadafi and his family. Not sure why. n/t Leopolds Ghost Feb 2012 #13
Or at least 3 random thugs. Swede Feb 2012 #17
Yes, because these 3 assholes represent all the rebels! *SARCASM* Odin2005 Feb 2012 #34
The people of Tawergha have not been allowed to go home. David__77 Feb 2012 #42
See post 89. Odin2005 Feb 2012 #90
Systematic abuse of detainees has been reported at a number of facilities, unfortunately. EFerrari Feb 2012 #45
I am not defending those commiting abuses. Odin2005 Feb 2012 #89
And the French were evil for helping us in the American Revolution?? JoePhilly Feb 2012 #51
Have the Libyan rebels produced any great works of political philosophy? Bonobo Feb 2012 #54
Is that how you judge a people. tabatha Feb 2012 #61
It is how I judge how prepared they are to set up a good, mature political system. Bonobo Feb 2012 #64
Heh, it took 5 years for the US to vote after the Revolutionary War. joshcryer Feb 2012 #69
Again, it is not a trashing of the Libyan people. Bonobo Feb 2012 #72
"it is not a trashing of the Libyan people" "a true people's movement" joshcryer Feb 2012 #73
Huh? You totally missed my point. Bonobo Feb 2012 #76
1) a peoples are not represented by their fighters 2) fighters do not represent the sole source... joshcryer Feb 2012 #79
Look how well it is going. Bonobo Feb 2012 #81
Continue trashing. joshcryer Feb 2012 #82
Yes,I will keep on resisting US military intervention and killing. Thanks. nt Bonobo Feb 2012 #84
So you were against us interviening in Bosnia? Odin2005 Feb 2012 #91
No, I wasn't. But like I said, the US is batting .100 or below. Bonobo Feb 2012 #92
You're not alone, fortunately. And now it seems the rest of the world is resisting it also. sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #98
And we're surprised? Taverner Feb 2012 #100
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Caught on video: Horrifyi...»Reply #93