Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Government Is Spying on America with Drones, Too [View all]DevonRex
(22,541 posts)53. Finally. From my favorite law site, Cornell. A Wex article.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/electronic_surveillance
"In 1978, Congress passed the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). The Act lowers the evidentiary showing needed to obtain a surveillance warrant with regard to foreign intelligence gathering and describes other procedures relating to physical and electronic surveillance relating to foreign intelligence. The Act's provisions also applies to American citizens suspected of espionage.
FISA's provisions permit electronic surveillance in two situations. First, FISA authorizes the President to use warrantless wiretapping if it relates to protecting the United States against a potential grave attack, sabotage, or espionage, on the that the government does not tap any U.S. citizen. Second, federal law enforcement may obtain a warrant for foreign intelligence taps that do not meet the criteria of the first situation. To obtain the warrant, the FISA court must find probable cause that the person to be tapped constitutes a foreign power or the agent of a foreign power and that a foreign power uses or will use the place to be tapped. FISA also created its own court system, housed within the Department of Justice. Known as "FISA courts" they deal exclusively with foreign intelligence warrant applications, orders directing compliance, and challenges to compliance orders."
END SNIPPET
The article is very informative, in case there are other things you need to know. It is on Cornell Law, the Cornell Law School's official site that is used by their own law students as well as law students all across the nation and even the globe.
"In 1978, Congress passed the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). The Act lowers the evidentiary showing needed to obtain a surveillance warrant with regard to foreign intelligence gathering and describes other procedures relating to physical and electronic surveillance relating to foreign intelligence. The Act's provisions also applies to American citizens suspected of espionage.
FISA's provisions permit electronic surveillance in two situations. First, FISA authorizes the President to use warrantless wiretapping if it relates to protecting the United States against a potential grave attack, sabotage, or espionage, on the that the government does not tap any U.S. citizen. Second, federal law enforcement may obtain a warrant for foreign intelligence taps that do not meet the criteria of the first situation. To obtain the warrant, the FISA court must find probable cause that the person to be tapped constitutes a foreign power or the agent of a foreign power and that a foreign power uses or will use the place to be tapped. FISA also created its own court system, housed within the Department of Justice. Known as "FISA courts" they deal exclusively with foreign intelligence warrant applications, orders directing compliance, and challenges to compliance orders."
END SNIPPET
The article is very informative, in case there are other things you need to know. It is on Cornell Law, the Cornell Law School's official site that is used by their own law students as well as law students all across the nation and even the globe.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
critical thinking would mean that one not wet their undergarments about remote control
geek tragedy
Jun 2013
#18
People who are bringing up the fact that water is wet, government surveys and bears...
uponit7771
Jun 2013
#31
The Googlemobile snapped me four times mowing my lawn. My lawn!!! For the love of God!
Buzz Clik
Jun 2013
#28
I believe in open laws and the Bill of Rights, not in casting nets. YMMV, however.
Melinda
Jun 2013
#7
FBI director says 22 people have access to surveillance database uncovered by Snowden
Catherina
Jun 2013
#13
They converged after 9-11. The Bush people's main complaint was that they were to separate
Catherina
Jun 2013
#33
Sigh. The FBI investigates acts of terrorism inside the U.S. Like the Boston bombing.
DevonRex
Jun 2013
#44
"The FBI couldn't get a FISA warrant on him though because he was a Green Card Holder" Citation?
Melinda
Jun 2013
#48
They can, but first have to prove membership in foreign terrorist organization or planning
DevonRex
Jun 2013
#49
Thanks. I'm a patient woman. Now that I know you'll supply it, I can wait at your leisure.
Melinda
Jun 2013
#51
I remember the Police Chief of Boston mentioned the possible use of drones for surveillance
BenzoDia
Jun 2013
#19
uninformed citizens can't consent, and we are not a democracy for that reason.
HiPointDem
Jun 2013
#43