Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Military "intervention" in Libya. THIS is what you get. [View all]Vattel
(9,289 posts)29. If persons who were relatively secure from attacks before the revolution
are now being attacked by thugs, that is a reason to think that replacing Ghadaffi was a wrong decision. There may be countervailing reasons to think replacing him was a good decision, but don't pretend that the posted facts are irrelevant to assessing the wisdom of NATO's intervention.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Gaddafi, who called blacks "sluggish" and "backward," and who blackmailed EU with opening...
joshcryer
Feb 2012
#4
Well, Gaddafi is gone now. It is weird that you have such anger over racism and bigotry but
Bonobo
Feb 2012
#5
I am sorry, but you are mistaken completely. That was the early propaganda we were
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#41
The naiveté about this intervention being for the people of Libya reminds me of...
Bonobo
Feb 2012
#8
My favorite piece of naivete is how the sock puppetry of the Libya fiction is so glaringly obvious
EFerrari
Feb 2012
#9
Facts are facts are facts. No matter where they come from. Are you ending the story? nt
Bonobo
Feb 2012
#14