General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Former law abiding gun owner shoots wife over dinner [View all]EOTE
(13,409 posts)What I've shown you doesn't even need reading skills to comprehend. Take a look at that chart again, would you? Kind of like asking a camel to do a jig, but what the hell. If you're not the graph type and instead would like to read some interesting information which doesn't jibe with your current views (LOL). Here is the result:
"More background checks are associated with fewer homicide (IRR:0.93, 95% CI:0.91-0.96) and suicide (IRR:0.98, 95% CI:0.96-1.00) deaths. Firearm homicide deaths are lower when states have checks for restraining orders (IRR:0.87, 95% CI:0.79-0.95) and fugitive status (IRR:0.79, 95% CI:0.72-0.88). Firearm suicide deaths are lower when states have background checks for mental illness (IRR:0.96, 95% CI:0.92-0.99), fugitive status (IRR:0.95, 95% CI:0.90-0.99) and misdemeanors (IRR:0.95, 95% CI:0.92-1.00). It does not appear that reductions in firearm deaths are offset by increases in non-firearm violent deaths."
But what the hell do those stupid scientists know?
http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2013/03/suicides-vs-handgun-background-checks
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22850436