Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The personality rabbit hole. [View all]redgreenandblue
(2,125 posts)97. As long as I've been here, DU has had these factions.
They have always waged a cold war against each other. Now it is going hot.
As for me: I've avoided "pro Obama vs. contra Obama" threads as much as I could. But the recent "everyone who disagrees with Obama is a racist" posts have struck me as particularly vicious.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
110 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If Snowden showed us evidence of his wild claims, there would be little or no divide.
randome
Jun 2013
#3
It was Snowden who made the claim about the NSA watching our thoughts form as we type.
randome
Jun 2013
#8
Does no one read the other posts? I was responding to marions ghost, who said...
randome
Jun 2013
#34
as there is no issue whatsoever, I have discounted the whole thing. No personalities, but there is
graham4anything
Jun 2013
#79
how would he get the 'evidence' when it's so top top secret that even congresspeople don't
HiPointDem
Jun 2013
#96
Snowden claimed he could spy on anyone, even the President's email if he wanted.
randome
Jun 2013
#99
i want to commend you even though we totally disagree on some of these "abstracts"
Monkie
Jun 2013
#109
You know, cali, I can tolerate criticism on policy and that's not the issue for me.
Skidmore
Jun 2013
#9
Obama asked for it! The caving and reaching across the aisle was very bad judgement.
L0oniX
Jun 2013
#48
Can you link to some posts that 'blame everything on 'some evil plan of the President'?
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#58
Discuss issues, not people. We should support (or attack) policies, not politicians.
Scuba
Jun 2013
#14
One side of this issue does not want to engage on the facts. They want to call people names
stevenleser
Jun 2013
#57
Does Greenwald really have a very personal and ugly animus toward the President, or is it a pose?
FarCenter
Jun 2013
#40
What he does is write about Civil Liberties issues, that is what he has always done. He was accused
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#47
You know they've found a media niche they can use to drive circulation of their output.
FarCenter
Jun 2013
#51
Not everything is about you. YOU however, implied that it was incorrect to say that there were more
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#86
When you find someone who resembles the kind of person you are talking about, let me know
stevenleser
Jun 2013
#54
Oh the ODS'ers are definitely here. Anyone who agrees with this below linked OP is one of them
stevenleser
Jun 2013
#82
I've sent that person DUMail asking them to respond. I am happy to do the same to anyone you suggest
stevenleser
Jun 2013
#93
The title of this thread by the OP is a fake analogy. It is a good sleight of hand though.
graham4anything
Jun 2013
#95
absolutely, and it really concerns me. What has kept DU different is valuing diversity of opinions,
NRaleighLiberal
Jun 2013
#64
Raising consciousness that ad hominem attacks are largely a distraction is a start.
snot
Jun 2013
#83
Greenwald might be personally unhappy about the negotiations over comprehensive immigration reform
Babel_17
Jun 2013
#108
You were doing great and I was ready to rec one of your posts for the first time in a while
Fumesucker
Jun 2013
#110