Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
7. B-b-b-baby, you ain't seen nothin' yet
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 12:54 PM
Feb 2012

Next up: Is the higher cost of insurance for employers who don't cover preventative health measures like birth control really just more war on some Christians? Sure, women who have full access to all their health choices are healthier, require less hospitalization and are cheaper to insure, but is that any reason why insurance companies should charge more to an employer who chooses not to provide coverage to women?

The correct and obvious answer is yes. However, this too will get tangled up in a bogus "First Amendment" argument that the popular media won't be able to figure out, so they'll just accept that this somehow infringes on someone's freedom to practice their religion.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The astounding Hutzpah of...»Reply #7