Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "I don't like to judge but..." [View all]LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)40. No one is holding him to a HIGHER standard, but rather the SAME standard HE applies
which is jump to every 'lowest common denominator' conclusion, and demand he face the same lens. Not a higher one. Just the same one. No 'double standard' pretending socio-economic judgement is different than sexual orientation judgement. They're not different here. Suggesting it is illustrates the double standard.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
sometimes when you have lost everything a $1 lottery ticket gives you just a bit of hope.
liberal_at_heart
Jun 2013
#26
just because it is a bad idea mathematically doesn't mean it can't bring just a little bit of
liberal_at_heart
Jun 2013
#31
Just because you have a degree in math and know it is a bad decision does not mean you get to
liberal_at_heart
Jun 2013
#36
I agree it is a political reality for the right wing. That just means we need to come up with a
liberal_at_heart
Jun 2013
#41
It doesn't even need to be relatives. Many who have the benefit don't have a car or are elderly
okaawhatever
Jun 2013
#45
Yes, it could very easily be someone who is doing the shopping for a group home of some sort.
Sheldon Cooper
Jun 2013
#12
Yes, there is a reason I mentioned he 'happens to be gay' because that is part of a minority
LaydeeBug
Jun 2013
#15
but white people are more likely to be against antipoverty programs
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2013
#17
i am not conflating but people shouldn't hold gay people generally to a higher standard
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2013
#32
No one is holding him to a HIGHER standard, but rather the SAME standard HE applies
LaydeeBug
Jun 2013
#40
do you think poor people as a demographic are less judgmental of gays?
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2013
#47
Please stop fishing for sanctimony...You are saying what he said was right and justifiable by
LaydeeBug
Jun 2013
#48
now you are just lying about me. at no point have i said that he was right
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2013
#49
you are fishing to justify why you randomly mentioned his sexual orientation
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2013
#55
EXACTLY. If he expects to judge, he should expect to be judged...everything else is semantics. nt
LaydeeBug
Jun 2013
#23
There are a million reasons this could happen...none of those would appease his spite though
LaydeeBug
Jun 2013
#24
I think the people who have never been on EBT don't know what they're talking about.
Initech
Jun 2013
#39
Since this person was using multiple EBT cards I would guess they are helping out other people
WhollyHeretic
Jun 2013
#42
Becoming temporariy unemployed does not mean you have to sell your car either.
Lil Missy
Jun 2013
#51