General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: EPA drops fracking pollution study...So I guess I must be a racist... [View all]H2O Man
(79,204 posts)When the administration cant actually suppress scientific information, it simply issues a new set of facts. The White House has taken special pains, for example, to shield Vice President Dick Cheneys old company, Halliburton, from sound science. The company is the leading practitioner of hydraulic fracturing, a new process used to extract oil and gas by injecting benzene into underground formations. EPA scientists studying hydraulic fracturing in 2002 found that it could contaminate groundwater supplies. A week after reporting their findings to congressional staff members, however, the EPA revised the data to indicate that benzene levels would not exceed government standards. In a letter to Congressman Henry Waxman (D-California), EPA officials said that the change was based on industry feedback. Waxman requested clarification on the nature of that feedback. Hes still waiting for an answer.
-- Robert Kennedy, Jr.; Crimes Against Nature; Harper-Collins; 2004; page 85.
Recommended.