Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)

10. you're trolling this issue

Reply to The Straight Story (Reply #3)

Fri Jun 21, 2013, 04:47 PM

Jun 2013

you know that guns are a different story, you know that guns already require background checks for *some* sales and others, likely including more dangerous and more dubious sales, *don't* require background checks.

yes, sell a weapon whose purpose is to kill, and only to kill, and a background check is a reasonable thing.

but you want us to fear that if you sell toilet paper or yard sculptures that suddenly background checks for all firearms sales will suddenly mean that you need a background check to blow your nose.

posting such crap is trolling on the issue and everyone here knows it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I found myself shorter of money this month than usual so I dug through [View all] Cleita Jun 2013 OP

All FFL dealers are required by Federal law premium Jun 2013 #1

Exactly, my point. If you have to do a few simple things to prove what your Cleita Jun 2013 #2

While it could help in some instances The Straight Story Jun 2013 #5

none of which actually makes background checks a bad idea CreekDog Jun 2013 #8

I have no problem with ALL firearms sales premium Jun 2013 #6

But if you sold your jewelery to your neighbor.... forthemiddle Jun 2013 #13

My neighbor is not a dealer and would probably be only interested in a few pieces. Cleita Jun 2013 #14

What else should we have background checks on? Buying booze? Smokes? Pit bulls? The Straight Story Jun 2013 #3

You have to be of age to buy booze and cigarettes, which means you need Cleita Jun 2013 #4

There is a difference between showing ID (which you don't always have to do at all) The Straight Story Jun 2013 #7

I used to be a bartender and I could get into a lot of trouble including getting Cleita Jun 2013 #9

you're trolling this issue CreekDog Jun 2013 #10

+1 geckosfeet Jun 2013 #11

So what other constitutional rights do you want to have background checks on? The Straight Story Jun 2013 #12

Did they write down a description of what you brought in, or take a photograph? petronius Jun 2013 #15

I'm thinking it's to protect the dealer from being considered a fence. Cleita Jun 2013 #16

I understand that it seems strange to non-shooters, but buying and possessing ammo petronius Jun 2013 #17

Go to a gun store and buy a gun Fla_Democrat Jun 2013 #18

I have no use for a gun. Food on the other hand, is what I would spend my money on. n/t Cleita Jun 2013 #19