Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
16. I'm thinking it's to protect the dealer from being considered a fence.
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 05:45 PM
Jun 2013

I assume if I showed up every week with stuff to be sold, I would fall under suspicion and he would be required to report me. I once owned a bookstore and in order to sell used books I had to have a pawnbroker's license. The police explained to me that they were looking for rare first edition books that are stolen and sold. I had to report every one I came across. I didn't have to bother with the ordinary used paperbacks and stuff. I assume this dealer must do the same for coins and jewelry. (He doesn't deal in guns or other artifacts.) It's what could be suspicious especially if there is a coincidence of burglaries in the area.

My point is though, how do kids like the ones in the news recently gain arsenals of guns and ammo without setting off alarms? It's because of our lax rules on the buying and selling of these weapons. We need better regulations to trace suspicious purchases especially in large amounts like this. One lone person stocking up on the amount of ammo that kid had in Santa Monica should have triggered off alarms but without any way to keep track of the sales, I don't see how they could have. I forgot to mention that I had to sign a document that itemized what I sold. So no matter where I go there is a file on me of my transactions with this person or another if I pick another broker all tied to my Drivers License.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

All FFL dealers are required by Federal law premium Jun 2013 #1
Exactly, my point. If you have to do a few simple things to prove what your Cleita Jun 2013 #2
While it could help in some instances The Straight Story Jun 2013 #5
none of which actually makes background checks a bad idea CreekDog Jun 2013 #8
I have no problem with ALL firearms sales premium Jun 2013 #6
But if you sold your jewelery to your neighbor.... forthemiddle Jun 2013 #13
My neighbor is not a dealer and would probably be only interested in a few pieces. Cleita Jun 2013 #14
What else should we have background checks on? Buying booze? Smokes? Pit bulls? The Straight Story Jun 2013 #3
You have to be of age to buy booze and cigarettes, which means you need Cleita Jun 2013 #4
There is a difference between showing ID (which you don't always have to do at all) The Straight Story Jun 2013 #7
I used to be a bartender and I could get into a lot of trouble including getting Cleita Jun 2013 #9
you're trolling this issue CreekDog Jun 2013 #10
+1 geckosfeet Jun 2013 #11
So what other constitutional rights do you want to have background checks on? The Straight Story Jun 2013 #12
Did they write down a description of what you brought in, or take a photograph? petronius Jun 2013 #15
I'm thinking it's to protect the dealer from being considered a fence. Cleita Jun 2013 #16
I understand that it seems strange to non-shooters, but buying and possessing ammo petronius Jun 2013 #17
Go to a gun store and buy a gun Fla_Democrat Jun 2013 #18
I have no use for a gun. Food on the other hand, is what I would spend my money on. n/t Cleita Jun 2013 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I found myself shorter of...»Reply #16