Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

petronius

(26,696 posts)
17. I understand that it seems strange to non-shooters, but buying and possessing ammo
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 06:05 PM
Jun 2013

in large quantities is very common and cost effective. Showing up with a new batch of gold jewelry every week would make you look like a thief very quickly, but buying 1000 or so rounds of ammunition every week just means you've been shooting or you've found a good deal - it's not outlier enough to trigger any sort of useful alarm. And I didn't pay particularly close attention, but I didn't get the sense that the Santa Monica or Boston guys had unusually high quantities.

I get what you're saying, but I don't think monitoring purchase quantities (of guns or ammo) has any chance of separating incipient mass killers from the average weekend shooter - there's just too much overlap. And really, a mass killer doesn't actually need all that much (1-2 guns and a few hundred rounds would be plenty) so the alarm triggers would be easy to avoid.

But I do think that sellers of used items (gold or guns) should be recorded, just to protect the dealer and recover stolen property. And every gun purchaser should pass a check.

However, you'll be glad to know that our state Senate just passed a bill (SB53) that would require background checks, permits, and fees for ammunition purchasers as well as guns - personally, I oppose it...

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

All FFL dealers are required by Federal law premium Jun 2013 #1
Exactly, my point. If you have to do a few simple things to prove what your Cleita Jun 2013 #2
While it could help in some instances The Straight Story Jun 2013 #5
none of which actually makes background checks a bad idea CreekDog Jun 2013 #8
I have no problem with ALL firearms sales premium Jun 2013 #6
But if you sold your jewelery to your neighbor.... forthemiddle Jun 2013 #13
My neighbor is not a dealer and would probably be only interested in a few pieces. Cleita Jun 2013 #14
What else should we have background checks on? Buying booze? Smokes? Pit bulls? The Straight Story Jun 2013 #3
You have to be of age to buy booze and cigarettes, which means you need Cleita Jun 2013 #4
There is a difference between showing ID (which you don't always have to do at all) The Straight Story Jun 2013 #7
I used to be a bartender and I could get into a lot of trouble including getting Cleita Jun 2013 #9
you're trolling this issue CreekDog Jun 2013 #10
+1 geckosfeet Jun 2013 #11
So what other constitutional rights do you want to have background checks on? The Straight Story Jun 2013 #12
Did they write down a description of what you brought in, or take a photograph? petronius Jun 2013 #15
I'm thinking it's to protect the dealer from being considered a fence. Cleita Jun 2013 #16
I understand that it seems strange to non-shooters, but buying and possessing ammo petronius Jun 2013 #17
Go to a gun store and buy a gun Fla_Democrat Jun 2013 #18
I have no use for a gun. Food on the other hand, is what I would spend my money on. n/t Cleita Jun 2013 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I found myself shorter of...»Reply #17