Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

WestStar

(202 posts)

4. They've been saying that for years. We used to call that "vaporware"

Reply to onehandle (Reply #3)

Fri Jun 21, 2013, 07:31 PM

Jun 2013

Apple tried to find a manufacturer for the retina display too, they found only Samsung was equipped to do it.

Of course that doesn't mean they won't keep trying. Hell, they dumped Motorola and went with Intel finally too. That was a bit of a "scandal" to the fanbois.

I have no problem with Apple but they don't really make anything, they design it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Tokyo court says Samsung infringed Apple 'bounce-back' patent [View all] onehandle Jun 2013 OP

This is sooo much like the Wright-Curtiss aileron patent wars... Cooley Hurd Jun 2013 #1

If you buy an "Apple phone" WestStar Jun 2013 #2

Keep up. Apple is killing those contracts. onehandle Jun 2013 #3

They've been saying that for years. We used to call that "vaporware" WestStar Jun 2013 #4