Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Is it OK to criticize Edward Snowden? [View all]"What's the point of "criticizing" his politics?...Snowden is not a political figure. He is not elected. He has no political power and he has no duty to serve the people as do elected officials in the government."
...same reason other people's politics are criticized. He exposed himself to public scrutiny by his actions. He committed a crime.
Bruce Schneier believes he will be remembered as a hero.
Edward Snowden broke the law by releasing classified information. This isn't under debate; it's something everyone with a security clearance knows. It's written in plain English on the documents you have to sign when you get a security clearance, and it's part of the culture. The law is there for a good reason, and secrecy has an important role in military defense.
But before the Justice Department prosecutes Snowden, there are some other investigations that ought to happen.
https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2013/06/prosecuting_sno.html
But before the Justice Department prosecutes Snowden, there are some other investigations that ought to happen.
https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2013/06/prosecuting_sno.html
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3009479
I don't think the situation bodes well for Snowden. The "hero" thing might not pan out.
Schneier also said that Snowden "broke the law," a fact that "isn't under debate," and that "the law is there for a good reason." He also acknowledged that the Justice Department will prosecute Snowden.
U.S. charges Snowden with espionage
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023063699
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
He was a paid employee, entrusted with security information but has run amok for the cause.
Thinkingabout
Jun 2013
#7
He is a crook, a thief, not worthy of any consideration. He knows he is a crook working
Thinkingabout
Jun 2013
#10
The issues was already known, maybe all did not know but I heard of this before the Patriot Act and
Thinkingabout
Jun 2013
#27
You assume that his actions are a net positive for the redress of those issues
Major Nikon
Jun 2013
#34
Isn't that what Bradley Manning is? A paid employee entrusted with security information? n/t
cherokeeprogressive
Jun 2013
#17
It should be OK to criticize anyone if they don't meet our expectations. n/t
NRaleighLiberal
Jun 2013
#6
sure it's ok but it's also irrelevant. The messenger and the motivation are both irrelevant.
bowens43
Jun 2013
#14
I sometimes wish Jesus had taken more of a "Fuck you, motherfuckers!" approach
HardTimes99
Jun 2013
#36
What is the purpose of this poll? To the extent Snowden has made himself a public
HardTimes99
Jun 2013
#33
Mucho gracias. I had seen the thread about boosting the Libertarian brand, but had
HardTimes99
Jun 2013
#38
Additionally, is it okay to criticize someone who gave classified intelligence to the Chinese?
flamingdem
Jun 2013
#39