Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Military "intervention" in Libya. THIS is what you get. [View all]boppers
(16,588 posts)35. No, it's like claiming the 60's were better than now.
Because, well, things were "orderly", and the oppressed peoples couldn't fight back, and the government ignored the whole issue.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Gaddafi, who called blacks "sluggish" and "backward," and who blackmailed EU with opening...
joshcryer
Feb 2012
#4
Well, Gaddafi is gone now. It is weird that you have such anger over racism and bigotry but
Bonobo
Feb 2012
#5
I am sorry, but you are mistaken completely. That was the early propaganda we were
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#41
The naiveté about this intervention being for the people of Libya reminds me of...
Bonobo
Feb 2012
#8
My favorite piece of naivete is how the sock puppetry of the Libya fiction is so glaringly obvious
EFerrari
Feb 2012
#9
Facts are facts are facts. No matter where they come from. Are you ending the story? nt
Bonobo
Feb 2012
#14