Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The abuse of FISA, prosecuting whistleblowers, PRISM, kill lists. Guess what. It isn't about Obama [View all]Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)90. "Cite what?"
I said "probable cause" at least twice and yet you lie about what it is I'm asking. You obviously lack the intellectual honesty to even acknowledge the debate.
As long as you're into wiki citations --
The Fourth Amendment (Amendment IV) to the United States Constitution is the part of the Bill of Rights which guards against unreasonable searches and seizures, along with requiring any warrant to be judicially sanctioned and supported by probable cause. It was adopted as a response to the abuse of the writ of assistance, which is a type of general search warrant, in the American Revolution. Search and seizure (including arrest) should be limited in scope according to specific information supplied to the issuing court, usually by a law enforcement officer, who has sworn by it. The Fourth Amendment applies to the states by way of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
Writ of Assistance
...
In colonial America[edit]
General writs of assistance played an important role in the increasing tensions that led to the American Revolution and the creation of the United States of America. In 1760, Great Britain began to enforce some of the provisions of the Navigation Acts by granting customs officers these writs. In New England, smuggling had become common. However, officers could not search a person's property without giving a reason. Colonists protested that the writs violated their rights as British subjects. The colonists had several problems with these writs. They were permanent and even transferable: the holder of a writ could assign it to another. Any place could be searched at the whim of the holder, and searchers were not responsible for any damage they caused. This put anyone who had such a writ above the law.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Writ_of_assistance
...
In colonial America[edit]
General writs of assistance played an important role in the increasing tensions that led to the American Revolution and the creation of the United States of America. In 1760, Great Britain began to enforce some of the provisions of the Navigation Acts by granting customs officers these writs. In New England, smuggling had become common. However, officers could not search a person's property without giving a reason. Colonists protested that the writs violated their rights as British subjects. The colonists had several problems with these writs. They were permanent and even transferable: the holder of a writ could assign it to another. Any place could be searched at the whim of the holder, and searchers were not responsible for any damage they caused. This put anyone who had such a writ above the law.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Writ_of_assistance
Your Loyalist credentials are beyond reproach.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
167 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The abuse of FISA, prosecuting whistleblowers, PRISM, kill lists. Guess what. It isn't about Obama [View all]
Nuclear Unicorn
Jun 2013
OP
The abuse of FISA, PRISM, surveilling journalists and kill lists are still realities.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jun 2013
#2
All the NSA stuff is based on Snowden's ridiculous claims that have no evidence.
randome
Jun 2013
#11
First the phone metadata has always been ruled as belonging to the companies, not individuals.
randome
Jun 2013
#23
That MD belongs to the carrier service is irrelevant. It allows a blanket invasion against citizens
Nuclear Unicorn
Jun 2013
#26
The OP is not about whether they have legal cover or not. All powers try to validate their
GoneFishin
Jun 2013
#40
Courts have ruled for a hundred years or so that third-party records are not yours.
randome
Jun 2013
#74
Bullshit. What do you think retroactive immunity for the telecoms was all about. LEGAL COVER.
GoneFishin
Jun 2013
#150
when randome says one thing in one thread, that directly contradicts what he said in another thread
Monkie
Jun 2013
#142
I could steal a pencil from the office and use that as evidence I stole something,
Life Long Dem
Jun 2013
#98
If you stole heroin from the office it would be proof your boss deals heroin.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jun 2013
#104
You forgot Meta Data, Meta Data, Meta Data, Meta Data, Meta Data, Meta Data,
GoneFishin
Jun 2013
#43
You misunderstood the tone of my post. It is in the context of a list of tired and worn excuses.
GoneFishin
Jun 2013
#149
I think that about covers it. I've been accused of being at least two of those as I
SlimJimmy
Jun 2013
#66
And yet no one can furnish evidence of this. It's all just manufactured crisis crap.
randome
Jun 2013
#17
How do you use the FOREIGN Intelligence Surveillance Act for a solely domestic operation?
Nuclear Unicorn
Jun 2013
#28
I don't consider it to be spying. I understand your point of view but I disagree with it.
randome
Jun 2013
#76
"...sometimes circumvented the spirit of the law..." isn't that melodramatic where I come from.
randome
Jun 2013
#39
By "fine line," I assume you're talking about that toss of a coin + 1%, right?
Th1onein
Jun 2013
#101
Why do you keep saying they are pulling everything? There is no evidence of that.
randome
Jun 2013
#112
Perhaps I don't understand, what if anything has changed from Bush to President Obama
A Simple Game
Jun 2013
#123
You misunderstood my question, what changed from Bush to President Obama?
A Simple Game
Jun 2013
#130
I mistakenly believed Obama had a hand in that. But he did have a hand in this.
randome
Jun 2013
#135
Obama is in power, it is on his terms and definitions that he goes after "leakers"
morningfog
Jun 2013
#113
I don't know the precise legal terms myself but I know they have very different legal meanings.
randome
Jun 2013
#79
Drake also stole documents and I believe that was the only charge that stuck, wasn't it?
randome
Jun 2013
#89
K & R Wonderful report, also the freedom to move about the country and our home streets might be a
Thinkingabout
Jun 2013
#5
I did not like the wiretapping without a warrant or even when the excuse we don't have time to
Thinkingabout
Jun 2013
#8
Do you think this will be overturned by courts, those judges know the Constitution and will see the
Thinkingabout
Jun 2013
#10
It will become the worst of the worst if you insist on sad arguments like that.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jun 2013
#22
It's better than your system where the law and the Constitution are ignored to spy on everyone.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jun 2013
#44
Clapper lied. He had time to prepare an answer and he had time to privately amend his answer
Nuclear Unicorn
Jun 2013
#42
Maybe he was afraid that some would blow it out of proportion. If so, he called that right.
randome
Jun 2013
#56
when randome says one thing in one thread, that directly contradicts what he said in another thread
Monkie
Jun 2013
#143
He lied. Let's call it what it was. He could have answered the question by saying
SlimJimmy
Jun 2013
#77
There have been at least three other whistle blowers that have verified what he said. Getting
SlimJimmy
Jun 2013
#114
The only 'secret document' that has shown anything is the warrant about phone metadata.
randome
Jun 2013
#118
They *needed* the warrant because the meta data does touch on the fourth amendment
SlimJimmy
Jun 2013
#138
Sorry for the delay in responding. We were out to dinner last night with friends.
SlimJimmy
Jun 2013
#165
K&R Also about the guy BEFORE Obama - and if that walking-around-free-thanks-to-Obama war criminal
MotherPetrie
Jun 2013
#45