Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Let's be Clear [View all]sheshe2
(97,627 posts)13. I could not agree with you more Tx!
I submit that an individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for law.
Could Martin Luther King have said it any better!
Cut and run...that is what cowards do!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
149 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think there is a difference between Snowden and the 'real' civil rights heroes
Tx4obama
Jun 2013
#1
You have no idea what "he envisioned himself". You just want to get a posse and lynch him
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#32
"Tortured logic"?? One sides traitor is the other sides patriot. Seems pretty
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#100
The FBI is a slobbering pile of twits. "Profiles" are for people who read horoscopes.
sibelian
Jun 2013
#148
And those living in denial bubbles trying to discourage others from discussing
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#111
My "martyr syndrome"?? Now this is about me? Apparently anything to defect from the discussion. nm
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#130
What I actually said was that some here are feverishly trying to shut down the discussion
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#132
Of course you are a real advocate of laws and justice. But it's ok if Clapper, a Republican lies to
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#140
I support laws and justice. But the 99% should be treated the same as the 1%.
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#142
Supreme Court and other courts have ruled meta-data isn't protected by the 4th amendment. n/t
Tx4obama
Jun 2013
#17
Oh christ. Not that shit again. The 16 yr old was not the target of the drone.
Tx4obama
Jun 2013
#18
Well, we could send the US Army and the US Air Force, like Bush/Cheney did. Now there's a good idea.
Hekate
Jun 2013
#37
So you support that idea there should be no attempt whatsoever to head off terrorists attacks here
treestar
Jun 2013
#137
That is not a point...it is an assumption based on the paradign you have created for yourself.
Sheepshank
Jun 2013
#114
No...you are wrong. Prima Facie points to a national traitor. But that is under discussion, no?
Sheepshank
Jun 2013
#117
"The only point I'm trying to get you to understand is that Snowden, in his own mind,*had* a cause."
Sheepshank
Jun 2013
#123
sure...I already gave you a list of possible causes? I don't understand what you are trying to imply
Sheepshank
Jun 2013
#127
Snowden took information and gave it to the media, not "a foreign government."
Comrade Grumpy
Jun 2013
#139
No, they don't. The majority of Americans have lost, if they ever had, any sense
Egalitarian Thug
Jun 2013
#29
Snowden knew when he STOLE government records/property that he was committing felonies
Tx4obama
Jun 2013
#74
The 'same government' ??? NO. The majority of those folks are either retired or DEAD
Tx4obama
Jun 2013
#77
this is not about Snowden or even Obama. This is about the NSA and the law that allows them
liberal_at_heart
Jun 2013
#27
Let's be clear. People who spy on us and try to keep that from us are criminals.
mhatrw
Jun 2013
#47
The Dalai Lama avoided the consequences of his "law breaking" and fled.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jun 2013
#55
"comfortable as possible without paying any price. Isn't that what libertarians do?"
great white snark
Jun 2013
#106
Makes since if he could not get a deal with the Chines for whatever he's stolen. n/t
Lady Freedom Returns
Jun 2013
#95
My guess from the way some of the posters and the OP pontificates is they would have us believe....
nolabels
Jun 2013
#101
Not to mention that there's nothing inherently wrong with having a security apparatus
treestar
Jun 2013
#131