Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(128,150 posts)
23. Excuse me for misinterpreting your reply.
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 02:40 AM
Jun 2013

It certainly was easy enough to do when you make a reference to "you idiots" and your post followed several other posts that looked upon the news as a favorable development. If your comment was stated as the "idiots at Tesla", then it would not have been open for misinterpretation. I did not view it as a personal attack on me but as an attack on the DU members that responded to the OP because "you idiots" was ambiguous. Since you clarified that your remarks were directed towards the folks at Tesla, I see no need to alert as long as our conversation remains within the Community Standards for DU.

I do have a considerable background in both chemistry and physics so I know that the production of batteries and electricity is not considered to be completely "clean" for the environment. I'm also knowledgeable about the production of gasoline and diesel since my father worked at a natural gas refinery, my brother worked at an oil refinery and I refined oil to obtain the various distillates when I took organic chemistry in college. Therefore, I don't consider those to be "clean" sources for fuel either.

My question to you about what other ways/processes produce an energy source to power a vehicle wasn't answered and apparently you have no suggestions of how to provide an alternate energy source that is feasible, economical and not detrimental to the environment. I actually hoped that you would offer an alternative that nobody else has mentioned since I prefer to solve problems rather than create problems.

As for your closing remark, I could ask the same question to you considering the arrogance of your reply. However, I will let the comment slide because it could be a matter of miscommunication between us and despite your allegation, it isn't about me. The subject of this thread is stated in the OP and most of the responders to the thread believe that this is a positive development when compared to the use of fossil fuels. If you believe that the development of battery swapping stations by Tesla or the use of rechargeable batteries is a negative development because of environmental concerns, then you are welcome to begin an OP for discussion and I will exercise my option to avoid posting on your thread.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Great plan. East Coast Pirate Jun 2013 #1
electric cars can't be the future.... Raster Jun 2013 #2
Big Oil will just have to get into politics... oh, wait. nt stlsaxman Jun 2013 #3
Plastics, fertilizer, building materials, body panels, power plants... FrodosPet Jun 2013 #15
The coal companies will overtake them hack89 Jun 2013 #29
Big coal ought to be behind Tesla, b/c that is the most common fuel used for electricity! Dustlawyer Jun 2013 #4
K&R TexasTowelie Jun 2013 #5
Elon Musk is awesome. Warren DeMontague Jun 2013 #6
And as long as you only go where charging stations and battery swap stations are, you're fine jmowreader Jun 2013 #7
Imagine solar paint usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jun 2013 #8
Tesla's planning to have charging stations across the nation in a couple years... backscatter712 Jun 2013 #9
It's true that at this point there are not enough charging stations TexasTowelie Jun 2013 #10
So your point is that we shouldnt buy electric cars? To inconvenient? They said the same when gasol rhett o rick Jun 2013 #13
My point is electric cars are an urban solution jmowreader Jun 2013 #27
When cars were new, you had to buy your fuel in bottles and hope you'd multiplied right. politicat Jun 2013 #14
Tesla needs to put charging stations at every major airport mainer Jun 2013 #11
Would be even better if we could smartgrid that infastructure. Sirveri Jun 2013 #17
A car shouldn't be dead if its left unused for a few days or weeks. Travis_0004 Jun 2013 #26
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jun 2013 #12
You are welcome. TexasTowelie Jun 2013 #18
I agree, this sounds like a great approach. Uncle Joe Jun 2013 #20
I find all the nay-saying and the big manufacturer's sabotage rather amusing. Egalitarian Thug Jun 2013 #16
Chevrolet makes the only practical electric jmowreader Jun 2013 #28
Be my guest. n/t Egalitarian Thug Jun 2013 #30
What's the range for the Tesla S v the Audi 20 gallon tank? flvegan Jun 2013 #19
I understand that you might disagree. TexasTowelie Jun 2013 #21
I was speaking to the folks at Tesla, actually. flvegan Jun 2013 #22
Excuse me for misinterpreting your reply. TexasTowelie Jun 2013 #23
"The future isn't batteries, you idiots. " Scootaloo Jun 2013 #24
Yeah! Go, Tesla, Go! n/t JimDandy Jun 2013 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Gone in 90 Seconds: Tesla...»Reply #23