Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: I trust President Obama [View all]
 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
130. I hate the 470X income inequality gap which has not changed one bit on Obama's watch.
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 04:00 AM
Jun 2013


Nothing different there now than in 2008. In fact, it is accelerating on Obama's watch. Nothing nothing nothing.


Corporate Profits Have Grown By 171 Percent Under Obama -- Highest Rate Since 1900

http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/corporate-profits-have-grown-171-percent-under-obama-highest-rate-1900

"Average annual corporate profit growth under Obama is the highest since 1900, whereas profit growth declined during both Bush presidencies. As a share of the economy, corporate profits have never been higher.
Unfortunately, this profit deluge has not been shared by workers, whose wages as a percentage of the economy have fallen to all-time lows. Workers also got dinged by the recent increase in the payroll tax, which was large enough to wipe out a minimum wage increase in some states."


8 Huge Corporate Handouts in the Fiscal Cliff Bill
http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/8-huge-corporate-handouts-fiscal-cliff-bill

"Throughout the months of November and December, a steady stream of corporate CEOs flowed in and out of the White House to discuss the impending fiscal cliff. Many of them, such as Lloyd Blankfein of Goldman Sachs, would then publicly come out and talk about how modest increases of tax rates on the wealthy were reasonable in order to deal with the deficit problem. What wasn’t mentioned is what these leaders wanted, which is what’s known as “tax extenders”, or roughly $205B of tax breaks for corporations. With such a banal name, and boring and difficult to read line items in the bill, few political operatives have bothered to pay attention to this part of the bill. But it is critical to understanding what is going on.

5) Subsidies for Goldman Sachs Headquarters – Sec. 328 extends 'tax exempt financing for York Liberty Zone,' which was a program to provide post-9/11 recovery funds. Rather than going to small businesses affected, however, this was, according to Bloomberg, 'little more than a subsidy for fancy Manhattan apartments and office towers for Goldman Sachs and Bank of America Corp.' Michael Bloomberg himself actually thought the program was excessive, so that’s saying something. According to David Cay Johnston’s The Fine Print, Goldman got $1.6 billion in tax free financing for its new massive headquarters through Liberty Bonds."


The Untouchables: How the Obama administration protected Wall Street from prosecutions
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jan/23/untouchables-wall-street-prosecutions-obama

Yes, Virginia, the Rich Continue to Get Richer: the Top 1% Got 121% of Income Gains Since 2009

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/02/yes-virginia-the-rich-continue-to-get-richer-the-1-got-121-of-income-gains-since-2009.html

U.S. banks in 2012 post highest profits since '06

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/26/us-usa-fdic-earnings-idUSBRE91P0N820130226?utm_source=Daily+Digest&utm_campaign=de8376aab3-DD_2_27_132_27_2013&utm_medium=email#.US5jjkXSlU8.twitter

This Year’s Subsidy to Wall Street = the Amount of This Year’s Sequester Cuts
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/02/this-years-subsidy-to-wall-street-the-amount-of-this-years-sequester-cuts.html#.US_yiFwwnHY.facebook

Don’t Blink, or You’ll Miss Another Bailout
http://www.cnbc.com/id/100466032

America faces more than a dozen deadlines, all caused by billionaires and wealth transfer

http://americablog.com/2013/02/america-faces-more-than-a-dozen-deadlines-all-caused-by-billionaires-and-wealth-transfer.html

Bank Bailout 2: Obama Lets Mortgage Abusers Off the Hook

http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2012/02/09-5


I hate the domestic terrorism Obama has either ordered or allowed to occur for well over year. That taken from the "patriot act" and FBI definitions of the use of force or threat of force against the civilian population, especially to alter their political position. 7400 of us bullied and jailed while the banksters who trashed the economy walk perfectly free, continuing to accept offers of taxpayer money bailouts. OUR money going to Wall Street, because Obama.

Here is what peaceful protesters faced at the Democratic National Convention last year. Tell me this is not a police state. At minimum, the 1st Amendment is dead on Obama's watch. The message is clear: Protest and you will face our riot cops and the prison-industrial complex.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002710303

Some five people are still fighting charges from last year.

The astonishing crack-down on whistle blowers. The spying upon journalists, who say sources are now clamming up due to spying, jamming the process of the freedom of press. DHS saying they can seize your electronics on a hunch anywhere along the border and up to 100 miles inland from it.

Robot death planes killing children in more than five countries with whom we are not at war, creating (purposefully, to me) the next generation of Osama Bin Ladens. Extrajudicial execution of Americans. Secret kill lists. Warrantless spying.

This is like some kind of bad movie plot, not the country based upon the Constitution and the principles of the Founding Fathers.

And of course:

Indefinite Surveillance: Say Hello to the National Defense Authorization Act of 2014
http://truth-out.org/news/item/17070-indefinite-surveillance-say-hello-to-the-national-defense-authorization-act-of-2014

Passed in 1978, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) set the groundwork for surveillance, collection, and analysis of intelligence gathered from foreign powers and agents of foreign powers, up to and including any individual residing within the U.S., who were suspected of involvement in potential terrorist activity. On October 26, 2001, a little over a month after 9/11, President George W. Bush signed the USA Patriot Act into law. Two provisions, Sec. 206, permitting government to obtain secret court orders allowing roving wiretaps without requiring identification of the person, organization, or facility to be surveyed, and Sec. 215 authorizing government to access and obtain “any tangible thing” relevant to a terrorist investigation, transformed foreign intelligence into domestic intelligence.

NDAA 2014 builds on the powers granted by both the Patriot Act and FISA by allowing unrestricted analysis and research of captured records pertaining to any organization or individual “now or once hostile to the United States”. Under the Patriot Act, the ability to obtain “any tangible thing” eliminated any expectation of privacy. Under NDAA 2014 Sec. 1061(g)(1), an overly vague definition of captured records enhances government power and guarantees indefinite surveillance.

On May 22, 2013 the Subcommittee on Intelligence, Emerging Threats and Capabilities, one of several Armed Services Committees, met to discuss the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2014. The main subject of the hearing was Sec. 1061, otherwise known as Enhancement of Capacity of the United States Government to Analyze Captured Records. This enhancement provision of NDAA 2014 would effectively create a new intelligence agency, one with the authority to analyze information gained under the Patriot Act, FISA, and known spying programs such as PRISM.

Sec. 1061(a) authorizes the Secretary of Defense to "establish a center to be known as the 'Conflict Records Research Center'" (Center). The main purpose of the center, according to the bill text, is to create a "digital research database," one with the capability to "translate" and facilitate research on "records captured from countries, organizations and individuals, now or once hostile to the United States." The authorization also says the Center will conduct research and analysis to "increase the understanding of factors related to international relations, counterterrorism and conventional and unconventional warfare, and ultimately, enhance national security."

(More at the link.)

A better question about Obama is, why the fuck aren't you paying attention to what is actually happening? Busy catapulting the propaganda? It is not possible to be an active DU member in GD and not be aware of even one reason Obama is doing more harm than good.

"Everything is fine, just keep watching TV" T-shirts are available here:

http://www.zazzle.com/everything_is_fine_t_shirt-235494518151481399

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I trust President Obama [View all] Uzair Jun 2013 OP
did you forget this? hobbit709 Jun 2013 #1
I sure hope he/she did.. choie Jun 2013 #4
+1 LWolf Jun 2013 #42
....... Are_grits_groceries Jun 2013 #2
+1 demmiblue Jun 2013 #7
And do you trust all Presidents who ever come after him? dkf Jun 2013 #3
No, I don't. Uzair Jun 2013 #31
If you're seriously that curious theaocp Jun 2013 #48
Of course not. But why will anything that happens during this administration pnwmom Jun 2013 #137
A cheney II maladministration would not care about anything he would have done to prevent Amonester Jun 2013 #140
I like President Obama but your op is pure propaganda and ridiculous syncophancy cali Jun 2013 #5
-1 graham4anything Jun 2013 #9
Speaking of ridiculous sycophancy MNBrewer Jun 2013 #18
I'll see your -1 premium Jun 2013 #116
+1000 darkangel218 Jun 2013 #12
The OP is the weekly "we love Obama" propaganda posted in GD. I am not sure why they rhett o rick Jun 2013 #20
good to have something offset the 'we hate Obama' propaganda every half hour. nt Whisp Jun 2013 #23
You do have something to offset that, its call the BOG bahrbearian Jun 2013 #24
95% of the democratic party strongly supports Barack Obama. Personally, that is 100% of graham4anything Jun 2013 #38
Maybe there should be an Edward Snowden group pnwmom Jun 2013 #138
Where should it be allowed? Uzair Jun 2013 #26
We get a number of these types of posts that appear to me to be aimed rhett o rick Jun 2013 #39
They should do this on Sunday's only ...the day of worship. L0oniX Jun 2013 #86
LMAO!!!! darkangel218 Jun 2013 #94
You owe me a new keyboard. dgibby Jun 2013 #95
DUZY! Demeter Jun 2013 #102
Second the +1000 truebluegreen Jun 2013 #22
So it's sycophancy to have the opinion treestar Jun 2013 #34
When it's said over and over it becomes propaganda. nm rhett o rick Jun 2013 #40
Both sides of the board do that. nt treestar Jun 2013 #62
No they dont. Both side definitely squabble about issues and policies. And rhett o rick Jun 2013 #75
no. didn't say that. cali Jun 2013 #65
+1 L0oniX Jun 2013 #84
+1000, this blind 100% support is as bad as the GOP did for BUSH. Embarrassing. n-t Logical Jun 2013 #108
How much are you clocking per hour from this nonsense? darkangel218 Jun 2013 #6
oh you nasty hater, you. cali Jun 2013 #8
lol darkangel218 Jun 2013 #11
So what if you have the right? Uzair Jun 2013 #30
God and Jesus get criticized a lot and they did more good shit than Obama HangOnKids Jun 2013 #77
It's one thing to say we can legitimately criticize him, Occulus Jun 2013 #114
The wallets of the majority of Americans outright disagree with you. I'd really love it Fire Walk With Me Jun 2013 #134
You do nothing but criticize treestar Jun 2013 #46
Dredging up old stories and any anniversary to not criticize PBO but to accuse him of heinous crimes freshwest Jun 2013 #117
OMG they really think the Magna Carta one would fly? treestar Jun 2013 #121
+ 1000 JustAnotherGen Jun 2013 #132
+1 graham4anything Jun 2013 #10
Tough call.... but there is some logic. jessie04 Jun 2013 #13
"I don't think there will ever be American boots on the ground." Laelth Jun 2013 #14
Every issue is not about "Obama." DirkGently Jun 2013 #15
Didn't another Democrat in the Oval Office famously say MNBrewer Jun 2013 #21
It's the Complaint Desk. Doesn't mean the President IS every issue. DirkGently Jun 2013 #27
I'm not saying it is all and always and only about Obama MNBrewer Jun 2013 #29
He's required to field the calls. But, for example, pushing him DirkGently Jun 2013 #35
True, the Surveillance State is well entrenched MNBrewer Jun 2013 #37
The OP does not say that there is anyone who deserves no criticism treestar Jun 2013 #50
"I cannot name one thing he has earned true criticism for," DirkGently Jun 2013 #52
So you find that impossible? treestar Jun 2013 #57
Yes. (nt). DirkGently Jun 2013 #70
I agree with you but... jimlup Jun 2013 #16
I trust no politician. Apophis Jun 2013 #17
All I care about is policy. tblue Jun 2013 #66
Agree. truebluegreen Jun 2013 #100
Do you trust your Congressional representation as much? MNBrewer Jun 2013 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Jun 2013 #25
That (the FISA vote) was a telling moment. deurbano Jun 2013 #56
And I don't trust the "Drs" Paul, Glenn Bekk or any other supposed "libertarian". baldguy Jun 2013 #28
Yep. freshwest Jun 2013 #119
It would insult Obama marions ghost Jun 2013 #32
Some people just don't like anyone who is in power treestar Jun 2013 #33
More of a tango than a tangle, but whatchamacallit Jun 2013 #49
yes, it does appear that you are the one who said that treestar Jun 2013 #58
No problem whatchamacallit Jun 2013 #60
Trust... kentuck Jun 2013 #36
This crap thrown at him is not criticism Progressive dog Jun 2013 #41
You nailed it. The basic tenets are the same. freshwest Jun 2013 #118
I trust him too. However in Jan 2017 I sure as hell don't trust that President Autumn Jun 2013 #43
That's a great point. Which, for me, makes the non-stop incessant "blame Obama" Number23 Jun 2013 #106
"I cannot name one thing he has earned true criticism for" DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2013 #44
Not to mention extra judiciary execution of American citizens and dgibby Jun 2013 #96
In a democracy it is the reponsiibility of the people to hold its public servants accountable. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2013 #45
Did you actually use the phrase "the greater good" Fearless Jun 2013 #47
"The greater good" Hong Kong Cavalier Jun 2013 #89
EXACTLY!! Fearless Jun 2013 #111
I trust no politician. Absolutely none. n/t NRaleighLiberal Jun 2013 #51
My lord nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #53
the one common thing i've noticed about the most trustworthy people i've known markiv Jun 2013 #54
Your trust and a couple of bucks might buy a bad cup of coffee somewhere. TheKentuckian Jun 2013 #55
What saddens me is JoeyT Jun 2013 #59
'And I didn't really want to bring race into the discussion' markiv Jun 2013 #61
It's truly disgusting that so many of the President's most ardent supporters/defenders here cali Jun 2013 #69
if any good has come out of this, it's markiv Jun 2013 #71
You shouldn't. Paralipsis is a well known rhetorical technique. JVS Jun 2013 #103
I totally agree Buzz505 Jun 2013 #63
"I cannot name one thing he has earned true criticism for, I really can't." woo me with science Jun 2013 #64
I reckon the OP's POV is all of that is either good, well intentioned, or he was forced by secret TheKentuckian Jun 2013 #68
Well, we're dealing with a special type of loyalty... woo me with science Jun 2013 #73
Damnation! TM99 Jun 2013 #126
Well, if you're gonna be picky tblue Jun 2013 #72
"Well, if you're gonna be picky." woo me with science Jun 2013 #74
You have a good start there for a slogan" the reality creating community" can use to silence dissent Dragonfli Jun 2013 #78
Dad always said - Never trust a politician. Dad 840high Jun 2013 #67
Loyalty is only a short step from delusional. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2013 #76
The genius behind the "I trust ..." bumper-sticker logic is it can be reused with the next president AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2013 #79
LOL avaistheone1 Jun 2013 #127
You trust a man that let Wall Street off the hook and yet sicks his dogs on medical marijuana Downtown Hound Jun 2013 #80
You trust a man who looks and sounds like a Koch? ucrdem Jun 2013 #93
"sounds like a Koch"? Skeeter Barnes Jun 2013 #104
You didn't! Chastised for noticing that once. But both are Libertarians, the new sacred cows at DU. freshwest Jun 2013 #122
triplets even ucrdem Jun 2013 #125
Too creepy! Is it inevitable that we will be ruled by this guy? freshwest Jun 2013 #128
bwahaha. ucrdem Jun 2013 #129
+1 JustAnotherGen Jun 2013 #133
Went to your link JustAnotherGen Jun 2013 #135
Plus 1! K & R! Lady Freedom Returns Jun 2013 #81
Try to think a little bigger tavalon Jun 2013 #82
Is this what a government shill looks like? L0oniX Jun 2013 #83
I think lot's here feel that way. That's why they're here. nt ucrdem Jun 2013 #91
really backwoodsbob Jun 2013 #85
Ever since the billh58 Jun 2013 #87
I don't trust any politician. bigwillq Jun 2013 #88
There was a period in 2009 where I had my doubts. ucrdem Jun 2013 #90
Ah lets wait and see Dr Fate engage you again HangOnKids Jun 2013 #98
I see him for what he is. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2013 #92
There have probably been essays written on the subject of Presidential Trust ever since the bike man Jun 2013 #97
I stand with Barack Obama OmahaBlueDog Jun 2013 #99
Obama is NO criminal. Security is his number 1 concern. NaturalCommunist Jun 2013 #101
Please HangOnKids Jun 2013 #110
The people who are saying he's "lying" to get the country into war with Syria just make me Number23 Jun 2013 #105
of course you do... RetroLounge Jun 2013 #107
I Need To Join You RL HangOnKids Jun 2013 #109
Really? EVERY ONE?? DiverDave Jun 2013 #112
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2013 #113
Did you forget your meds when writing this tripe? Daniel537 Jun 2013 #115
i trust him also except for the spying crap and a few other things Liberal_in_LA Jun 2013 #120
I trust my County Tax Assessor Taverner Jun 2013 #123
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2013 #124
I hate the 470X income inequality gap which has not changed one bit on Obama's watch. Fire Walk With Me Jun 2013 #130
+1000 OP mwrguy Jun 2013 #131
This OP is exhibit A of what happens when quinnox Jun 2013 #136
the naive is strong in this one...... bowens43 Jun 2013 #139
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I trust President Obama»Reply #130