Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OrwellwasRight

(5,317 posts)
68. I'm sorry? "Haven't found anything sustainable" to criticize the President about?
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 11:17 AM
Jun 2013

Where do we start?

In a prime example of poor negotiating strategy (even if you didn't want it in the end, which I won't argue about): You do NOT cut off your left flank and make clear that not only single payer, but also the public option is off the table. Again, doesn't matter if he wanted it in the end, but by cutting off his left flank, he had no cards to play, thus the bill was a multibillion dollar giveaway to the health insurance companies.

No one prosecuted for the Financial Meltdown.

Promising to renegotiate NAFTA. Criticizing US trade policy for not protecting labor and the environment, saying the investor protections go too far. And then pursuing the TPP, the largest trade agreement ever for the US (except for the WTO), using the exact same model he criticized.

Not a single word in favor of the Employee Free Choice Act. No effort to improve labor rights. After he promised to do so.

Worst deal ever on taxes at end of 2010. ALL Bush tax cuts extended and all he got in exchange was a lousy temporary extension of unemployment? And allowed the Estate Tax law (which was going to zero% -- no taxes on estates of any kind or size) to remain in place. The cost comparison of the trade off is astounding.

Could have fixed the Fed Ex loophole that allows FedEx to hire employees and pretend they are independent contractors through IRS action. Didn't do it.

No real response to the BP disaster to make sure it doesn't happen again.

Proposing to cut Social Security.

Made the sequester deal when in fact we don't need any budget balancing at all. You balance the budget in good times (just like Clinton did). You do not balance the budget in bad times. That is Keynesian economics 101. What we need is a gigantic investment in the economy to put people back to work and get the economy growing again. But no, Obama keeps talking about the grand bargain and all the cuts he'll make before he has bothered to fix the economy. The sequester is only hurting job creation and working people. And while he does have a Congress that refuses to spend, he could refuse to sign the stupid austerity budgets and sequester bills. HE doesn't. He signs.

Instead of forcing Congress's hand to fix sequester, he signed the airport fix so that his rich friends could continue flying without delays.

And these are just the sellouts to his friends on Wall Street.

Need I also raise:

Guantanamo not closed. (And while yes Congress defunded any attempt to move the prisoners here, he could have closed down the prison by letting people go. After all, they have been charged with no crime and already served lots of time for nothing.)

Deporting more people than Bush

Continued assault on marijuana dispensaries.

Continued use of the PATRIOT Act to spy on Americans in violation of our 4th Amendment rights.

We're STILL in Afghanistan. Still.

Face it, this man is pro-corporate, DLC, New Dem, pro-business, etc. He is being criticized no more and no less than the last Democratic president we had who sold the working class down the river in order to appease Wall Street (Clinton). If you and your ilk can't face real criticism and have to call us racist, then so be it. When standing up for the for the working class in America is racist, it's a sad, sad day. I hope you can eat your money. I can't.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's the new "hip to be square" around here Aerows Jun 2013 #1
Hmm. Ash_F Jun 2013 #2
Because we all live in Libya Aerows Jun 2013 #4
That was the side Obama supported. /nt Ash_F Jun 2013 #5
Which side? Aerows Jun 2013 #8
Are you really that ignorant about what was all over the news only two years ago? Ash_F Jun 2013 #13
Well, that's going to gain you supporters Aerows Jun 2013 #14
At some point you have to try to help yourself Ash_F Jun 2013 #27
Yes, at some point you have to help yourself Aerows Jun 2013 #113
There is nothing conservative about .... dawg Jun 2013 #3
The same straw man they used treestar Jun 2013 #6
Let me try a logic exercise with you. nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #7
It's oversimplifying to say the government is not more transparent treestar Jun 2013 #15
You try filing FOIAs. nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #18
I have filed FOIAs treestar Jun 2013 #20
Hey, Nadin, do you know what ever happened with this? woo me with science Jun 2013 #25
Nope nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #31
What isn't oversimplifying Aerows Jun 2013 #21
Hey, to be fair nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #22
You are right Aerows Jun 2013 #26
I don't think they specifically called anyone a racist treestar Jun 2013 #24
Treestar Aerows Jun 2013 #33
Obama is not going to bomb Seattle treestar Jun 2013 #36
If he did Aerows Jun 2013 #38
Thank you for reminding me why Treestar nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #40
I think that's unfair treestar Jun 2013 #53
Actually for that, no I wouldn't treestar Jun 2013 #42
You will support any Democrat in the White House Aerows Jun 2013 #48
I think the Democratic party principles are pretty good for the most part treestar Jun 2013 #52
I'm sorry? "Haven't found anything sustainable" to criticize the President about? OrwellwasRight Jun 2013 #68
All of that has been dealt with, over and over treestar Jun 2013 #71
Had it been dealt with Aerows Jun 2013 #90
"has been dealt with"? OrwellwasRight Jun 2013 #110
What they mean by dealt with is that anyone who has brought up substance Generic Other Jun 2013 #115
Anyone who thinks Obama is being held to an unfair, "higher" standard is crazy MNBrewer Jun 2013 #51
that was helpful. treestar Jun 2013 #54
Pretty much Aerows Jun 2013 #56
You didn't have DU during the Clinton Presidency. dawg Jun 2013 #63
No, it's flat-out lying. Scootaloo Jun 2013 #84
It has already happened Aerows Jun 2013 #86
Oh dear, you think this started with Snowden/NSA criticisms? How precious. KittyWampus Jun 2013 #92
Show me. n/t Scootaloo Jun 2013 #95
Problem is you can't show me even one person who 'fawns' over Bill Clinton who calls Obama Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #105
"There are many other agencies and they might be much more transparent. No one has discussed Th1onein Jun 2013 #76
I don't think you've zonked this argument treestar Jun 2013 #78
Are we reading the same DU? Th1onein Jun 2013 #81
Having followed several links there treestar Jun 2013 #82
What you are saying is false, on it's face. Th1onein Jun 2013 #83
That's the only place it is coming from. treestar Jun 2013 #104
Given the fact that McClatchy was one of the media groups that actually told the truth about Th1onein Jun 2013 #116
That's as dishonest as when you said 'gay people have plenty of rights' and claimed that Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #101
maybe your inane op should give you pause. cali Jun 2013 #9
+1 Zorra Jun 2013 #60
People confuse Tea Party-style tone and hatred of Obama for conservatism. geek tragedy Jun 2013 #10
and most people here who criticize the President don't hate him at all. cali Jun 2013 #11
Criticism on policy certainly isn't hate. geek tragedy Jun 2013 #17
And having an orgasm Aerows Jun 2013 #23
I generally disapprove of the charge of racism in policy discussions. geek tragedy Jun 2013 #30
Can you point to a post that Aerows Jun 2013 #41
From people here, no. geek tragedy Jun 2013 #45
As did Ralph Nader n/t sweetloukillbot Jun 2013 #108
Again, it's cute you think this behavior began only recently with Snowden/NSA. KittyWampus Jun 2013 #94
I agree with that. cali Jun 2013 #35
We've been agreeing too much lately. geek tragedy Jun 2013 #44
ah well, wait a minute and we'll find something to scrap over. cali Jun 2013 #46
I want conservative policies to fail, absolutely. Union Scribe Jun 2013 #61
Do those policies reflect the overall nature geek tragedy Jun 2013 #67
Yes. OrwellwasRight Jun 2013 #69
You ought to take this piece of crap OP and flush it. Comrade Grumpy Jun 2013 #12
+ 1 nt stillwaiting Jun 2013 #28
No kidding. 99Forever Jun 2013 #65
Do you find yourself defending conservative ideas to the bitter end? The Link Jun 2013 #16
Not to mention VERY conservative on environmental issues. East Coast Pirate Jun 2013 #47
No, I don't. PDJane Jun 2013 #19
Nope. I'm me. Herlong Jun 2013 #29
Don't forget the anti govt. screed Floyd_Gondolli Jun 2013 #32
oh give it up backwoodsbob Jun 2013 #34
+1 GoCubsGo Jun 2013 #49
yeah, sure, that's the ticket. HiPointDem Jun 2013 #37
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2013 #39
... The Link Jun 2013 #43
that's it backwoodsbob Jun 2013 #58
Welcome to DU, lol. Union Scribe Jun 2013 #62
Maybe Hannity and all those Fox folks 'have' infiltrated DU and we just don't know it yet. Tx4obama Jun 2013 #64
Are they running out of bodies to throw into the fray? RetroLounge Jun 2013 #66
SO now the smear is conservatism.... perfect. MNBrewer Jun 2013 #50
It's suddenly "conservative" to state the utterly obvious truth? Bullshit. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2013 #55
Yet concerns about racism are sneered at here michigandem58 Jun 2013 #72
No one's sneering at actual, valid racism. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2013 #74
"Valid" racism? Is that like "legitimate" rape? michigandem58 Jun 2013 #75
No. It's like the actual racism many on the right engage in, WRT President Obama DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2013 #77
Welcome to Ignore. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2013 #80
Race has never been DU's strong point n/t Scootaloo Jun 2013 #85
Concerns about racism are not sneered at here. Ms. Toad Jun 2013 #98
This message was self-deleted by its author Violet_Crumble Jun 2013 #57
Kick n/t Violet_Crumble Jun 2013 #59
Since I refuse to break the rules.... Marrah_G Jun 2013 #70
Or maybe those hurling ridiculous and baseless charges should consider the consequences Egalitarian Thug Jun 2013 #73
omg n/t leeroysphitz Jun 2013 #79
i keep having sadistic fantasies about ppl who have undermined my personal brand BOG PERSON Jun 2013 #87
Bullshit post, Blue_In_AK Jun 2013 #88
are you sounding like a fascist tea bagger lately? cause this sure does. nt xchrom Jun 2013 #89
when people opposed the expansion of surveillance when Bush/Cheney were in power was that racism? Douglas Carpenter Jun 2013 #91
You need to read Pelosi's fact sheet michigandem58 Jun 2013 #99
oh nonsense - You would not be justifying this expansion if there was a Republican President. Douglas Carpenter Jun 2013 #103
No, but strangely I have been walking like an Egyptian Vinnie From Indy Jun 2013 #93
you can call me anything you like. liberal_at_heart Jun 2013 #96
Maybe the fact that President Obama is acting like a conservative should give you pause. npk Jun 2013 #97
ouch, that'll leave a mark Puzzledtraveller Jun 2013 #114
This is patently offensive. Ms. Toad Jun 2013 #100
I go to Market Street in San Francisco and bark about a flat tax to passerby. Why? DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2013 #102
For fuck's sake. It is because the apologists have their morningfog Jun 2013 #106
"The race card" = conservative lingo michigandem58 Jun 2013 #109
LOL! THis is too fucking funny!~ morningfog Jun 2013 #111
Obama wouldn't make the grade with you because duffyduff Jun 2013 #107
No "talking like a conservative" doesn't "give me pause". sibelian Jun 2013 #112
You should add the whole "Godamn commie-lovin' traitor" routine too. nt Bonobo Jun 2013 #117
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Are you talking like a co...»Reply #68