Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Guardian now reporting that it looks like Ecuador is Snowden's destination [View all]dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)2. "It is not clear how he was allowed to leave Hong Kong if this happened."
Morons - you may need a passport to enter a country : not to leave one.
There has been an angry reaction in the US to news of Snowdens departure. Keith Alexander, head of the NSA, called Snowden an individual who is not acting, in my opinion, with noble intent"............."quite from making us look a complete pack of ****s. "
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
105 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Guardian now reporting that it looks like Ecuador is Snowden's destination [View all]
cali
Jun 2013
OP
I didn't "maliciously redirect" your statement. That's another problem with name-calling.
pnwmom
Jun 2013
#91
try getting on an international flight without a passport (or visa if also needed)
WolverineDG
Jun 2013
#29
CNN reporting US has asked Cuba and Ecuador to either not let Snowden in or to expel him
Catherina
Jun 2013
#3
Well, if Cuba doesn't comply, we'll slap an embargo on them....oh, wait....
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jun 2013
#6
If Ecuador allows Snowden in, will there be punitive economic sanctions against Ecuador put
Zorra
Jun 2013
#44
But you think arresting him would have been a brave move by Hong Kong
muriel_volestrangler
Jun 2013
#37
Hong Kong is irrelevant, read up on how China is in charge of all national security there
flamingdem
Jun 2013
#41
So you think it's *China* that would have been brave to do what the USA tells it?
muriel_volestrangler
Jun 2013
#46
How deep do you think corporate persons' (who have been mining data ever since 2001, the
patrice
Jun 2013
#45
Responding to why he wasn't arrested. If the government is owned by corporate persons, who
patrice
Jun 2013
#61
I'd have thought anyone who doesn't want him to reveal any more would want a quick arrest
muriel_volestrangler
Jun 2013
#75
It can be a mistake to assume that we know everything about how/why the 1% acts as it does...
patrice
Jun 2013
#82
Actually, we should go all of the way back, not just 2001, because corporate attorneys are NOT
patrice
Jun 2013
#58
You really should phrase that as a possible PART of a diverse whole, because "them" who
patrice
Jun 2013
#64
well, Patrice, it probably scales up from family/school systems when we're young
villager
Jun 2013
#69
I completely agree. The PRICE of avoiding the positives & negatives of this will be higher than
patrice
Jun 2013
#74
i think you discount the resentment and anger that many countries feel toward the U.S.
cali
Jun 2013
#42
My daughter lives in the Northwest, so I worry. I have been in an extinct volcanoe
patrice
Jun 2013
#83
Propaganda from either direction is still propaganda. Do you oppose the spread of free information?
patrice
Jun 2013
#38
Isn't that the country where the Bush's bought enormous real estate sitting on top of
patrice
Jun 2013
#35
Thanks! Forgive me for being so lazy about googling. Just tired & fed up here! nt
patrice
Jun 2013
#65
Some of my concerns include people who consider it a matter of "conscience" that others should
patrice
Jun 2013
#85
Good! Now the only thing Snowden has to worry about is getting stabbed with an icepick.
backscatter712
Jun 2013
#71
Well, the contractors didn't divulge anything, one of their employees did.
scarletwoman
Jun 2013
#99
If you're directly employed by a government agency, you're a government employee.
scarletwoman
Jun 2013
#101
Oh please. You want a National Security State in the hands of private corporations?
scarletwoman
Jun 2013
#103