Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
4. Hartman didn't miss the birther story--in fact, she wrote this about it at the time:
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 02:15 PM
Jun 2013
Birtherist response highlights racial undertones of ‘debate’

By Rachel Rose Hartman, Yahoo! News | The Ticket – Wed, Apr 27, 2011

...


But the winner of the 2008 election, Barack Obama, has faced a relentless campaign questioning his U.S. citizenship--and thereby the legitimacy of his presidency--that has disregarded the facts.

Questions regarding Obama's birth certificate have persisted for more than two years, as the president noted Wednesday at a press conference announcing the release of his long-form birth certificate. A vast array of evidence attests to Obama's citizenship--including a certificate of live birth, signed affidavits from people who viewed Obama's long-form birth certificate, confirmation by Hawaiian officials, and independent investigations by news outlets. Nevertheless, "this thing just keeps going" as Obama said this morning. Even after the White House released the long-form certificate of Obama's birth, birther leader Orly Taitz—who has filed unsuccessful lawsuits seeking to obtain access to Obama's birth certificate—sought to cast doubt on the document's authenticity, suggesting that in 1961, Hawaiian officials would have classified Obama as "Negro" rather than using designation "African," which suggests, in her view, a more contemporary concern for "political correctness."

So what's fueling the dogged questioning of Obama's origins? Many critics of the birther movement say its core tenets--and its stubborn resistance to evidence disproving those beliefs--can be traced to racial hostilities. The fundamental birtherist conviction, these critics say, is that an African-American can't have legitimately won the presidency--and that his elevation to power therefore has to be the result of an elaborate subterfuge.


...


Birthers emphatically deny such criticism. But it's difficult to apprehend the ongoing resistance to proof of Obama's citizenship without crediting racial fear as a significant factor. At first, after all, many adherents of birtherism argued that the administration fueled speculation by failing to release the long-form version of Obama's birth certificate, but now that this version has been released to the public, the call continues to go out for other kinds of information about Obama's past to be released--a level of scrutiny that neither McCain nor Obama's 43 predecessors in the Oval Office were expected to face.

...


http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/birth-certificate-won-t-end-race-related-attacks-213432124.html


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Just like the GOP lpbk2713 Jun 2013 #1
Goes to show how looney they are that the 2011 release treestar Jun 2013 #2
She's an JustAnotherGen Jun 2013 #3
Hartman didn't miss the birther story--in fact, she wrote this about it at the time: pinboy3niner Jun 2013 #4
Which makes it even weirder. Maybe a journalism intern wrote the recent piece mainer Jun 2013 #12
Or it was careless writing PatSeg Jun 2013 #25
That is disgusting... ljm2002 Jun 2013 #5
Because she made a mistake? Or because she is a woman who made a mistake? SylviaD Jun 2013 #14
OMG that is truly hilarious... ljm2002 Jun 2013 #16
It was an error, the reporter quickly filed an amended story. Why should she lose her livelihood? SylviaD Jun 2013 #30
Glad to hear that... ljm2002 Jun 2013 #32
I do apologize for my original response. n/t SylviaD Jun 2013 #35
Oh Good Grief! Yes, of course its all about gender, the "mistake" is just a convenient pretext n/t progree Jun 2013 #19
Sexism does lurk behind a lot of things. Are you willfully blind? n/t SylviaD Jun 2013 #31
Not EVERYTHING is sexist. There was nothing, *NOTHING* in ljm2002's post that was sexist progree Jun 2013 #33
I apologize for the willfully blind remark. n/t SylviaD Jun 2013 #36
ljm2002 is female, BTW. progree Jun 2013 #34
We need to keep a sharp eye on new and revised history textbooks as they are released. tridim Jun 2013 #6
He'll be listed in Newspeak as #666 instead of #44. freshwest Jun 2013 #20
Oh boy... Scurrilous Jun 2013 #7
Birther FAIL Initech Jun 2013 #8
I'll give her the benifit of the doubt, she could just be ignorant. n/t Ganja Ninja Jun 2013 #9
As somebody posted above, she actually wrote about the birther crap n2doc Jun 2013 #10
anyone who would write such crap simply is not credible Skittles Jun 2013 #11
Yahoo! Won't Even Comment? DallasNE Jun 2013 #13
Birthers just double down. NutmegYankee Jun 2013 #15
"ancestors"? neglecting his Irish roots. Ireland should be all in her face. SleeplessinSoCal Jun 2013 #18
That's pretty great that he can meet his relatives like that. Can you imagine okaawhatever Jun 2013 #28
tweeted ms. hartman SleeplessinSoCal Jun 2013 #17
The reader comments at the WaPo make my head hurt. The Stupid.. it burns... Hekate Jun 2013 #21
Maybe it was just a sly joke struggle4progress Jun 2013 #22
Or maybe she's a moron tkmorris Jun 2013 #23
Links upthread indicate she wrote stories debunking the birther crap struggle4progress Jun 2013 #24
It looks like a mistake. Strange that nobody apologized. Makes you wonder. Democracyinkind Jun 2013 #26
It just goes on and on. One smear fails, bring back an old one. graham4anything Jun 2013 #27
Since she had a reasonable and informed story on the birthers, i'll assume it was okaawhatever Jun 2013 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»They just can't get over ...»Reply #4