Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: They just can't get over it-Obama birthplace mistake: Yahoo! News declines comment [View all]pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)4. Hartman didn't miss the birther story--in fact, she wrote this about it at the time:
Birtherist response highlights racial undertones of debate
By Rachel Rose Hartman, Yahoo! News | The Ticket Wed, Apr 27, 2011
...
But the winner of the 2008 election, Barack Obama, has faced a relentless campaign questioning his U.S. citizenship--and thereby the legitimacy of his presidency--that has disregarded the facts.
Questions regarding Obama's birth certificate have persisted for more than two years, as the president noted Wednesday at a press conference announcing the release of his long-form birth certificate. A vast array of evidence attests to Obama's citizenship--including a certificate of live birth, signed affidavits from people who viewed Obama's long-form birth certificate, confirmation by Hawaiian officials, and independent investigations by news outlets. Nevertheless, "this thing just keeps going" as Obama said this morning. Even after the White House released the long-form certificate of Obama's birth, birther leader Orly Taitzwho has filed unsuccessful lawsuits seeking to obtain access to Obama's birth certificatesought to cast doubt on the document's authenticity, suggesting that in 1961, Hawaiian officials would have classified Obama as "Negro" rather than using designation "African," which suggests, in her view, a more contemporary concern for "political correctness."
So what's fueling the dogged questioning of Obama's origins? Many critics of the birther movement say its core tenets--and its stubborn resistance to evidence disproving those beliefs--can be traced to racial hostilities. The fundamental birtherist conviction, these critics say, is that an African-American can't have legitimately won the presidency--and that his elevation to power therefore has to be the result of an elaborate subterfuge.
...
Birthers emphatically deny such criticism. But it's difficult to apprehend the ongoing resistance to proof of Obama's citizenship without crediting racial fear as a significant factor. At first, after all, many adherents of birtherism argued that the administration fueled speculation by failing to release the long-form version of Obama's birth certificate, but now that this version has been released to the public, the call continues to go out for other kinds of information about Obama's past to be released--a level of scrutiny that neither McCain nor Obama's 43 predecessors in the Oval Office were expected to face.
...
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/birth-certificate-won-t-end-race-related-attacks-213432124.html
By Rachel Rose Hartman, Yahoo! News | The Ticket Wed, Apr 27, 2011
...
But the winner of the 2008 election, Barack Obama, has faced a relentless campaign questioning his U.S. citizenship--and thereby the legitimacy of his presidency--that has disregarded the facts.
Questions regarding Obama's birth certificate have persisted for more than two years, as the president noted Wednesday at a press conference announcing the release of his long-form birth certificate. A vast array of evidence attests to Obama's citizenship--including a certificate of live birth, signed affidavits from people who viewed Obama's long-form birth certificate, confirmation by Hawaiian officials, and independent investigations by news outlets. Nevertheless, "this thing just keeps going" as Obama said this morning. Even after the White House released the long-form certificate of Obama's birth, birther leader Orly Taitzwho has filed unsuccessful lawsuits seeking to obtain access to Obama's birth certificatesought to cast doubt on the document's authenticity, suggesting that in 1961, Hawaiian officials would have classified Obama as "Negro" rather than using designation "African," which suggests, in her view, a more contemporary concern for "political correctness."
So what's fueling the dogged questioning of Obama's origins? Many critics of the birther movement say its core tenets--and its stubborn resistance to evidence disproving those beliefs--can be traced to racial hostilities. The fundamental birtherist conviction, these critics say, is that an African-American can't have legitimately won the presidency--and that his elevation to power therefore has to be the result of an elaborate subterfuge.
...
Birthers emphatically deny such criticism. But it's difficult to apprehend the ongoing resistance to proof of Obama's citizenship without crediting racial fear as a significant factor. At first, after all, many adherents of birtherism argued that the administration fueled speculation by failing to release the long-form version of Obama's birth certificate, but now that this version has been released to the public, the call continues to go out for other kinds of information about Obama's past to be released--a level of scrutiny that neither McCain nor Obama's 43 predecessors in the Oval Office were expected to face.
...
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/birth-certificate-won-t-end-race-related-attacks-213432124.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
They just can't get over it-Obama birthplace mistake: Yahoo! News declines comment [View all]
n2doc
Jun 2013
OP
Hartman didn't miss the birther story--in fact, she wrote this about it at the time:
pinboy3niner
Jun 2013
#4
It was an error, the reporter quickly filed an amended story. Why should she lose her livelihood?
SylviaD
Jun 2013
#30
Oh Good Grief! Yes, of course its all about gender, the "mistake" is just a convenient pretext n/t
progree
Jun 2013
#19
Not EVERYTHING is sexist. There was nothing, *NOTHING* in ljm2002's post that was sexist
progree
Jun 2013
#33
We need to keep a sharp eye on new and revised history textbooks as they are released.
tridim
Jun 2013
#6
"ancestors"? neglecting his Irish roots. Ireland should be all in her face.
SleeplessinSoCal
Jun 2013
#18
That's pretty great that he can meet his relatives like that. Can you imagine
okaawhatever
Jun 2013
#28
It looks like a mistake. Strange that nobody apologized. Makes you wonder.
Democracyinkind
Jun 2013
#26
Since she had a reasonable and informed story on the birthers, i'll assume it was
okaawhatever
Jun 2013
#29